The Reliability of Rater Variability.
作者信息
Gingerich Andrea
出版信息
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Apr;12(2):159-161. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00163.1.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Reliability of Rater Variability.评分者变异性的可靠性。
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Apr;12(2):159-161. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00163.1.
2
Agreement between resident and faculty emergency physicians in the application of NEXUS criteria for suspected cervical spine injuries.住院医师与急诊专科医师在应用NEXUS标准诊断疑似颈椎损伤方面的一致性。
J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
3
Stulberg classification system for evaluation of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease: intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.用于评估Legg-Calvé-Perthes病的Stulberg分类系统：评分者内和评分者间的可靠性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Sep;81(9):1209-16. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199909000-00002.
4
Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures.桡骨远端骨折分类的可靠性和可重复性。
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013;47(3):153-7. doi: 10.3944/aott.2013.3038.
5
Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features.儿童急诊评估的评价者间信度：生理和临床特征。
Arch Dis Child. 2021 Feb;106(2):149-153. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Synchronous collection of multisource feedback evaluations does not increase inter-rater reliability.多源反馈评估的同步收集并不会提高评分者间信度。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18 Suppl 2:S65-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01162.x.
7
The reliability of performance assessment during residency.住院医师培训期间绩效评估的可靠性。
Acad Med. 1990 Nov;65(11):716. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199011000-00022.
8
Reliability in evaluating letters of recommendation.推荐信评估的可靠性。
Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10):1029. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200010000-00022.
9
The inter-rater reliability and internal consistency of a clinical evaluation exercise.一项临床评估活动的评分者间信度和内部一致性。
J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Mar-Apr;7(2):174-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02598008.
10
Assessing the inter-rater reliability and agreement of a hybrid assessment framework in the Emergency Department.评估急诊科混合评估框架的评分者间信度和一致性。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(6):430-434. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000289.
引用本文的文献
1
Enhancing authenticity, diagnosticity and quivalence (AD-Equiv) in multicentre OSCE exams in health professionals education: protocol for a complex intervention study.提高医学专业多中心 OSCE 考试的真实性、诊断性和等效性（AD-Equiv）：一项复杂干预研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):e064387. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064387.
2
Determining influence, interaction and causality of contrast and sequence effects in objective structured clinical exams.确定客观结构化临床考试中对比和序列效应的影响、相互作用和因果关系。
Med Educ. 2022 Mar;56(3):292-302. doi: 10.1111/medu.14713. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
本文引用的文献
1
E-ASSESS: Creating an EPA Assessment Tool for Structured Simulated Emergency Scenarios.电子评估：为结构化模拟应急场景创建一个EPA评估工具。
J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Apr;12(2):153-158. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00533.1.
2
Realizing One's Own Subjectivity: Assessors' Perceptions of the Influence of Training on Their Conduct of Workplace-Based Assessments.实现自我主体性：评估者对培训对其进行基于工作场所评估的影响的看法。
Acad Med. 2019 Dec;94(12):1970-1979. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002943.
3
Simulation versus real-world performance: a direct comparison of emergency medicine resident resuscitation entrustment scoring.模拟与实际表现：急诊医学住院医师复苏委托评分的直接比较
Adv Simul (Lond). 2019 May 1;4:9. doi: 10.1186/s41077-019-0099-4. eCollection 2019.
4
From opening the 'black box' to looking behind the curtain: cognition and context in assessor-based judgements.从打开“黑箱”到揭开帷幕：基于评估者判断的认知和背景。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019 Mar;24(1):85-102. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9851-0. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Comparatively salient: examining the influence of preceding performances on assessors' focus and interpretations in written assessment comments.相对显著：考察先前表现对评估者在书面评估意见中关注点和解释的影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;23(5):937-959. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9841-2. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Validation of educational assessments: a primer for simulation and beyond.教育评估的验证：模拟及其他领域的入门指南。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2016 Dec 7;1:31. doi: 10.1186/s41077-016-0033-y. eCollection 2016.
7
Factors Influencing Mini-CEX Rater Judgments and Their Practical Implications: A Systematic Literature Review.影响迷你临床演练评估者判断的因素及其实际意义：一项系统文献综述
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):880-887. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001537.
8
Rater cognition: review and integration of research findings.评价者认知：研究结果的回顾与综合。
Med Educ. 2016 May;50(5):511-22. doi: 10.1111/medu.12973.
9
Selecting and Simplifying: Rater Performance and Behavior When Considering Multiple Competencies.选择与简化：考虑多种能力时的评分者表现与行为
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):41-51. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1107489.
10
Entrustability Scales: Outlining Their Usefulness for Competency-Based Clinical Assessment.可托付性量表：概述其在基于胜任力的临床评估中的实用性。
Acad Med. 2016 Feb;91(2):186-90. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001045.
Zotero 插件