• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准手动按压与实时视听反馈按压的心肺复苏比较:一项随机对照试验性研究。

A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual compressions versus compressions with real-time audiovisual feedback: A randomized controlled pilot study.

作者信息

Vahedian-Azimi Amir, Rahimibashar Farshid, Miller Andrew C

机构信息

Trauma Research Center, Nursing Faculty, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Jan-Mar;10(1):32-37. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_84_19. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

DOI:10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_84_19
PMID:32322552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7170341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Strategies that improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guideline adherence may improve in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes. Real-time audiovisual feedback (AVF) is one strategy identified by the American Heart Association and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation as an area needing further investigation. The aim of this study was to determine if in patients with IHCA, does the addition of a free-standing AVF device to standard manual chest compressions during CPR improve sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates (primary outcome) or CPR quality or guideline adherence (secondary outcomes).

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel study of patients undergoing resuscitation with chest compressions for IHCA in the mixed medical-surgical intensive care units (ICUs) of two academic teaching hospitals. Patients were randomized to receive either standard manual chest compressions or compressions using the Cardio First Angel™ feedback device.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven individuals were randomized, and 22 were included. CPR quality evaluation and guideline adherence scores were improved in the intervention group ( = 0.0005 for both). The incidence of ROSC was similar between groups ( = 0.64), as was survival to ICU discharge ( = 0.088) and survival to hospital discharge ( = 0.095).

CONCLUSION

The use of the Cardio First Angel™ compression feedback device improved adherence to publish CPR guidelines and CPR quality. The insignificant change in rates of ROSC and survival to ICU or hospital discharge may have been related to small sample size. Further clinical studies comparing AVF devices to standard manual compressions are needed, as are device head-to-head comparisons.

摘要

背景

提高心肺复苏(CPR)指南依从性的策略可能会改善院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的结局。实时视听反馈(AVF)是美国心脏协会和国际复苏联合委员会确定的需要进一步研究的领域之一。本研究的目的是确定在IHCA患者中,在心肺复苏期间标准手动胸外按压基础上增加独立的AVF设备是否能提高自主循环恢复(ROSC)的持续率(主要结局)或心肺复苏质量及指南依从性(次要结局)。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、对照、平行研究,研究对象为在两家学术教学医院的综合内科和外科重症监护病房(ICU)接受IHCA胸外按压复苏的患者。患者被随机分为接受标准手动胸外按压或使用Cardio First Angel™反馈设备进行按压两组。

结果

67人被随机分组,22人被纳入研究。干预组的心肺复苏质量评估和指南依从性评分均有所提高(两者均P = 0.0005)。两组之间的ROSC发生率相似(P = 0.64),入住ICU时存活(P = 0.088)及出院时存活(P = 0.095)情况也相似。

结论

使用Cardio First Angel™按压反馈设备可提高对已发布的心肺复苏指南的依从性及心肺复苏质量。ROSC率以及入住ICU或出院时存活率的变化不显著可能与样本量小有关。需要进一步开展将AVF设备与标准手动按压进行比较的临床研究,以及设备之间的直接比较研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/7170341/d44b9b1fdd0b/IJCIIS-10-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/7170341/d44b9b1fdd0b/IJCIIS-10-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a19/7170341/d44b9b1fdd0b/IJCIIS-10-32-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual compressions versus compressions with real-time audiovisual feedback: A randomized controlled pilot study.标准手动按压与实时视听反馈按压的心肺复苏比较:一项随机对照试验性研究。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Jan-Mar;10(1):32-37. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_84_19. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
2
Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis.院内心脏骤停心肺复苏期间使用手持式非自动体外除颤器设备进行实时视听反馈:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):109-122. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_155_20. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
3
Effect of the Cardio First Angel™ device on CPR indices: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Cardio First Angel™ 设备对心肺复苏指标的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Crit Care. 2016 May 17;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1296-3.
4
Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.住院心脏骤停患者的实时按压反馈:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
J Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 22;7:5. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0357-5. eCollection 2019.
5
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.心脏骤停时机械胸外按压与徒手胸外按压的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD007260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007260.pub4.
6
Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心肺复苏实时视听反馈设备能否改善患者预后?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
World J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):531-541. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i10.531.
7
Comparison of the effects of using feedback devices for training or simulated cardiopulmonary arrest.比较使用反馈设备进行培训或模拟心肺骤停的效果。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 27;19(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02669-z.
8
Association between chest compression rates and clinical outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest at an academic tertiary hospital.一所学术型三级医院院内心脏骤停后胸外按压速率与临床结局的关联
Resuscitation. 2017 Jan;110:154-161. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
9
Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial.机械胸外按压与同步除颤对院外心脏骤停患者心肺复苏的影响:LINC 随机试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jan 1;311(1):53-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282538.
10
Addition of Audiovisual Feedback During Standard Compressions Is Associated with Improved Ability.在标准按压过程中增加视听反馈与改善能力有关。
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;19(2):437-444. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.11.34327. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time feedback for CPR quality - A scoping review.心肺复苏质量的实时反馈——一项范围综述。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Jul 31;19:100730. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100730. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Chest compression quality and patient outcomes with the use of a CPR feedback device: A retrospective study.使用心肺复苏反馈装置对胸外按压质量和患者预后的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46862-x.
3
Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation real-time audiovisual feedback devices improve patient outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review.院内心搏骤停:综述。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1200-1210. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1696.
2
Real-time compression feedback for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial.住院心脏骤停患者的实时按压反馈:一项多中心随机对照临床试验。
J Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 22;7:5. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0357-5. eCollection 2019.
3
Is a mechanical-assist device better than manual chest compression? A randomized controlled trial.机械辅助设备是否优于手动胸外按压?一项随机对照试验。
心肺复苏实时视听反馈设备能否改善患者预后?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
World J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 26;15(10):531-541. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i10.531.
4
Comparison between automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the rescue of cardiac and respiratory arrest.自动心肺复苏与徒手心肺复苏在心脏骤停和呼吸骤停抢救中的比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2208-2214. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.6598.
5
Survival to intensive care unit discharge among in-hospital cardiac arrest patients by applying audiovisual feedback device.应用视听反馈装置对院内心搏骤停患者进行重症监护病房出院存活率的评估。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Dec;8(6):4652-4660. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13628. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
6
Do automated real-time feedback devices improve CPR quality? A systematic review of literature.自动实时反馈设备能否提高心肺复苏质量?文献系统评价
Resusc Plus. 2021 Mar 27;6:100108. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100108. eCollection 2021 Jun.
7
Real-time audio-visual feedback with handheld nonautomated external defibrillator devices during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis.院内心脏骤停心肺复苏期间使用手持式非自动体外除颤器设备进行实时视听反馈:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2020 Jul-Sep;10(3):109-122. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_155_20. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2017 Aug 29;9:63-67. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S133074. eCollection 2017.
4
Impact of a feedback device on chest compression quality during extended manikin CPR: a randomized crossover study.反馈装置对长时间模拟人心肺复苏期间胸外按压质量的影响:一项随机交叉研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;34(9):1754-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.077. Epub 2016 May 28.
5
Effect of the Cardio First Angel™ device on CPR indices: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Cardio First Angel™ 设备对心肺复苏指标的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Crit Care. 2016 May 17;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1296-3.
6
[Randomised study of the relationship between the use of CPRmeter® device and the quality of chest compressions in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation].[关于CPRmeter®设备的使用与模拟心肺复苏中胸外按压质量之间关系的随机研究]
Enferm Intensiva. 2016 Jan-Mar;27(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Part 8: Education, Implementation, and Teams: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.第8部分:教育、实施与团队:2015年心肺复苏和心血管急救科学及治疗建议国际共识。
Circulation. 2015 Oct 20;132(16 Suppl 1):S242-68. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000277.
8
Part 1: Executive Summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.第1部分:执行摘要:2015年心肺复苏与心血管急救科学及治疗建议国际共识。
Circulation. 2015 Oct 20;132(16 Suppl 1):S2-39. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000270.
9
The System-Wide Effect of Real-Time Audiovisual Feedback and Postevent Debriefing for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality Improvement Initiative.实时视听反馈及事件后汇报对院内心脏骤停的全系统影响:心肺复苏质量改进倡议
Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2321-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001202.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices.标准手动胸外按压心肺复苏与使用TrueCPR和PocketCPR反馈设备的心肺复苏效果比较。
Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(10):924-30. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0084. Epub 2015 May 19.