Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Eugeniavägen 3, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Jun;162(6):1363-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04317-6. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Hydrocephalus requiring external ventricular drainage is common following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Timing and strategy for the discontinuation of the external ventricular drain (EVD) are, however, controversial as guidelines are based on limited scientific evidence. A recent similar survey showed that guidelines and recommendations are not being followed. We conducted a questionnaire survey regarding the management of EVD treatment in patients with aSAH and investigated current treatment practice, consensus, and adherence to guidelines within the neurosurgical departments in Scandinavia.
A questionnaire concerning the management of EVD discontinuation in patients with hydrocephalus following aSAH was distributed to all 14 neurosurgical departments in Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden, and Denmark). Neurosurgeons and neurosurgical trainees at all levels were asked to complete the questionnaire individually. A total of 175 completed questionnaires were received between May 2018 and April 2019, resulting in a response rate of 64 %.
Eighty-five percent of respondents reported no knowledge of international guidelines regarding EVD discontinuation in patients with hydrocephalus following aSAH. Within every department, respondents disagreed on whether a common discontinuation strategy was followed or not. Seventy-four percent decided upon the EVD discontinuation strategy mainly determined by patients' clinical condition and drainage volume. Forty-five percent considered Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) the most important clinical variable when assessing the timing of EVD discontinuation. There was general agreement towards the initiation of EVD discontinuation 4-7 days after ictus of aSAH in a stable patient with a drainage volume of < 150 ml/day and intracranial pressure (ICP) < 15 mmHg.
Awareness of and adherence to international guidelines regarding EVD discontinuation in patients with hydrocephalus following aSAH were limited in Scandinavia. Internal consensus at department level was absent. Initiation of the discontinuation process appeared to be case dependent and mainly influenced by the patients' clinical condition and drainage volume. GCS was the clinical variable considered most important when deciding on the initiation of EVD discontinuation.
蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后需要外部脑室引流的脑积水很常见。然而,外部脑室引流(EVD)的停止时间和策略存在争议,因为指南是基于有限的科学证据制定的。最近的一项类似调查显示,指南和建议并未得到遵循。我们对 aSAH 患者的 EVD 治疗管理进行了问卷调查,并调查了斯堪的纳维亚神经外科部门当前的治疗实践、共识以及对指南的遵循情况。
向斯堪的纳维亚(挪威、瑞典和丹麦)的 14 个神经外科部门的所有神经外科医生和神经外科住院医生发放了一份关于 aSAH 后脑积水患者 EVD 停止管理的问卷,要求各级医生单独填写。2018 年 5 月至 2019 年 4 月期间共收到 175 份完整的问卷,回复率为 64%。
85%的受访者表示不了解关于 aSAH 后脑积水患者 EVD 停止的国际指南。在每个科室内部,对于是否遵循共同的停止策略,受访者意见不一。74%的人主要根据患者的临床状况和引流量来决定 EVD 的停止策略。45%的人认为格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)是评估 EVD 停止时机最重要的临床变量。对于稳定的患者,在 aSAH 发作后 4-7 天,引流量<150ml/天且颅内压(ICP)<15mmHg 时,大多数人都倾向于开始停止 EVD。
斯堪的纳维亚地区对 aSAH 后脑积水患者 EVD 停止的国际指南的认识和遵循程度有限。科室内部也没有达成共识。停止过程的启动似乎取决于具体病例,主要受到患者的临床状况和引流量的影响。在决定开始停止 EVD 时,GCS 是被认为最重要的临床变量。