• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良(白江式)保留迷走神经与常规腹腔镜脾切除术和贲门周围血管离断术的随机临床试验。

Modified (Bai-Jiang style) vagus nerve-preserving versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, 98 West Nantong Rd, Yangzhou, 225000, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1786-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07573-w. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-020-07573-w
PMID:32323014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digestive system complications are among the most important causes of postoperative poor quality of life after open and conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (CLSD). We firstly developed a modified vagus nerve-preserving laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection (MVLSD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether MVLSD is feasible and safe and to determine whether MVLSD can effectively eliminate postoperative digestive system complications, in comparison with CLSD.

METHOD

In this randomized controlled single-center study, 60 patients with cirrhosis were randomly assigned to undergo either CLSD (n = 30) or MVLSD (n = 30) between April and December 2018. The primary outcome was delayed gastric emptying (DGE). Endoscopic physicians were blinded to group assignments.

RESULTS

One patient who received MVLSD withdrew from the study. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, incidence of blood transfusion, time to off-bed activity, time to first flatus, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Compared with CLSD, operation time and incidences of DGE, diarrhea, epigastric fullness, and overall postoperative complications were all significantly reduced in the MVLSD group (all P < 0.05). Compared with CLSD, MVLSD was associated with significantly increased weight and albumin levels at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively versus preoperative values (all P < 0.05). The curative effect of resolving gastroesophageal variceal bleeding was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

MVLSD is not only a technically feasible and safe procedure, it is also succinct and convenient. Furthermore, MVLSD effectively reduces postoperative digestive system complications, contributing to improved quality of life.

摘要

背景

消化系统并发症是开腹和传统腹腔镜脾切除术和奇静脉门静脉离断术(CLSD)后生活质量差的最重要原因之一。我们首次开发了改良迷走神经保留腹腔镜脾切除术和奇静脉门静脉离断术(MVLSD)。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估 MVLSD 是否可行和安全,以及与 CLSD 相比,MVLSD 是否能有效消除术后消化系统并发症。

方法

在这项随机对照的单中心研究中,60 例肝硬化患者于 2018 年 4 月至 12 月间被随机分为 CLSD 组(n=30)或 MVLSD 组(n=30)。主要结局是胃排空延迟(DGE)。内镜医师对分组情况不知情。

结果

1 例接受 MVLSD 的患者退出研究。两组间术中出血量、输血发生率、下床活动时间、首次排气时间和术后住院时间无显著差异。与 CLSD 相比,MVLSD 组 DGE、腹泻、上腹胀满和总体术后并发症的发生率均显著降低(均 P<0.05)。与 CLSD 相比,MVLSD 术后 1、6 和 12 个月的体重和白蛋白水平均显著高于术前(均 P<0.05)。两组在解决胃食管静脉曲张出血的疗效上相似。

结论

MVLSD 不仅是一种技术可行和安全的手术,而且简洁方便。此外,MVLSD 可有效减少术后消化系统并发症,提高生活质量。

相似文献

1
Modified (Bai-Jiang style) vagus nerve-preserving versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a randomized clinical trial.改良(白江式)保留迷走神经与常规腹腔镜脾切除术和贲门周围血管离断术的随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1786-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07573-w. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Vagus nerve-preserving versus conventional laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.保留迷走神经的与常规腹腔镜脾切除术和奇静脉断流术。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2696-2703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5965-3. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
3
Vagus nerve-guided (modified Bai-Jiang-style) robotic-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.迷走神经引导(改良版白江式)机器人辅助腹腔镜脾切除术和奇静脉断流术。
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Apr;19(2):e2490. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2490. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
4
Vagus Nerve-Preserving Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection with Versus Without Intraoperative Endoscopic Variceal Ligation: a Randomized Clinical Trial.保留迷走神经的腹腔镜脾切除术与奇静脉门断流术加或不加术中内镜下静脉曲张结扎术的随机临床试验
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Sep;26(9):1838-1845. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05374-1. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic approach of Bai-Jiang-style vagus nerve-preserving splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下白江式保留迷走神经脾切除术及奇静脉门静脉离断术的比较
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1773-1780. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01236-2. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
6
Laparoscopic azygoportal disconnection with and without splenectomy for portal hypertension.腹腔镜贲门周围血管离断术联合与不联合脾切除术治疗门静脉高压症。
Int J Surg. 2016 Oct;34:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.519. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
7
Modified laparoscopic and open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for portal hypertension.改良腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3182-2. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
Modified laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection combined with cell salvage is feasible and might reduce the need for blood transfusion.改良腹腔镜脾切除术及奇静脉门脉离断术联合血液回收是可行的,且可能减少输血需求。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 28;20(48):18420-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18420.
9
Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection: a Systematic Review.腹腔镜脾切除术与奇静脉门断流术:一项系统评价
JSLS. 2015 Oct-Dec;19(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00091.
10
Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection for bleeding varices with hypersplenism.腹腔镜脾切除术及奇静脉门静脉离断术治疗伴有脾功能亢进的出血性静脉曲张
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008 Feb;18(1):37-41. doi: 10.1089/lap.2007.0028.

引用本文的文献

1
The decreased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhotic portal hypertension patients after laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.腹腔镜脾切除术和贲门周围血管离断术可降低乙肝病毒相关肝硬化门静脉高压症患者肝细胞癌的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8522-8531. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10454-7. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG0912.I期胃癌胃切除术后的远期并发症:JCOG0912的补充分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2958-2968. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09804-8. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Clinical effects of cluster technology optimization and innovations on laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection: a single-center retrospective study with 500 consecutive cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative advantages of modified laparoscopic vs open splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.改良腹腔镜与开放性脾切除术及奇静脉门静脉离断术的围手术期优势
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 21;20(27):9146-53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9146.
2
Relationship between gastroduodenal interdigestive migrating motor complex and quality of life in patients with distal subtotal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌远端胃大部切除术后患者胃十二指肠消化间期移行性复合运动与生活质量的关系
Int Surg. 2000 Apr-Jun;85(2):118-23.
3
Postoperative evaluation of pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.
集群技术优化与创新对腹腔镜脾切除术及奇静脉门静脉离断术的临床效果:一项包含500例连续病例的单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7409-7418. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09159-0. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
4
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic approach of Bai-Jiang-style vagus nerve-preserving splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下白江式保留迷走神经脾切除术及奇静脉门静脉离断术的比较
Updates Surg. 2022 Oct;74(5):1773-1780. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01236-2. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
早期胃癌保留幽门胃切除术的术后评估
Br J Surg. 1996 Feb;83(2):266-9.