• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区居家养老模式下友好社区公共环境评价指标及权重研究。

Research on Evaluation Indexes and Weights of the Aging-Friendly Community Public Environment under the Community Home-Based Pension Model.

机构信息

Department of Art Design, Guangdong Industry Polytechnic, Guangzhou 510300, China.

Department of Architecture, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichuang 41349, Taiwan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082863.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17082863
PMID:32326293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7216188/
Abstract

Community home-based care has become China's main mode of care for the elderly, and the aging of the community public environment has become the focus of attention of all of society. This study uses a questionnaire survey and the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to (i) obtain the relative weights of indicators in the hierarchy structure of an aging-friendly community public environment and (ii) build a complete indicator evaluation system for the aging-friendly community public environment. The research results show that the quasi-side evaluation index framework of the aging-friendly community public environment is composed of four factors (i.e., community facilities, community road system, community environmental function, and community landscape configuration) and 24 evaluation indexes. The weights of the indicators in descending order are "community road system (w = 0.374)", "community facilities (w = 0.310)", "community environmental functions (w = 0.264)", and "community landscape configuration (w = 0.052)". The research results show that "community road systems" and "community facilities" are important indicators of the aging-friendliness of a community public environment. "Community environmental function" is an important supplemental factor of the aging-friendliness of a community public environment. "Community landscape configuration" involves improving the construction of the community public environment from the perspective of landscaping. Among all indicator levels, the weights of "Community road floor slip resistance" (w = 0.1795), "Daily health and medical facilities (w = 0.1181)", and "Provide social interaction functions (w = 0.1067)" are ranked the highest. These results show that ensuring the physical and mental health of the elderly in the community is a core criterion for evaluating the aging-friendliness of a public environment in the community. In this study, an index evaluation weight system is established to clarify the best approach to constructing an aging-friendly community public environment in accordance with previous standard specifications. This system can further clarify the scientific method for evaluating aging-friendly public environments built in the past and can serve as a reference for the practical world.

摘要

社区居家养老已成为中国养老的主要模式,社区公共环境的老龄化也成为全社会关注的焦点。本研究采用问卷调查和模糊层次分析法(FAHP),(i)获得老龄化友好型社区公共环境层次结构中指标的相对权重;(ii)构建一个完整的老龄化友好型社区公共环境指标评价体系。研究结果表明,老龄化友好型社区公共环境的准侧评价指标框架由四个因素(即社区设施、社区道路系统、社区环境功能和社区景观配置)和 24 个评价指标组成。指标权重按降序排列依次为“社区道路系统(w=0.374)”、“社区设施(w=0.310)”、“社区环境功能(w=0.264)”和“社区景观配置(w=0.052)”。研究结果表明,“社区道路系统”和“社区设施”是社区公共环境老龄化友好程度的重要指标,“社区环境功能”是社区公共环境老龄化友好程度的重要补充因素,“社区景观配置”涉及从景观建设角度改善社区公共环境。在所有指标层次中,“社区道路地面防滑性”(w=0.1795)、“日常健康和医疗设施”(w=0.1181)和“提供社会互动功能”(w=0.1067)的权重最高。这些结果表明,保障社区老年人的身心健康是评价社区公共环境老龄化友好程度的核心标准。本研究建立了指标评价权重体系,明确了按照以往标准规范构建老龄化友好型社区公共环境的最佳方法,进一步厘清了过去建设的老龄化友好型公共环境的科学评价方法,可为实践界提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8073/7216188/fb8a58029cf9/ijerph-17-02863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8073/7216188/fb8a58029cf9/ijerph-17-02863-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8073/7216188/fb8a58029cf9/ijerph-17-02863-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Research on Evaluation Indexes and Weights of the Aging-Friendly Community Public Environment under the Community Home-Based Pension Model.社区居家养老模式下友好社区公共环境评价指标及权重研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082863.
2
Research on the Weighting Values of Community Aging-Friendly Construction Indexes With Different Expert Groups.不同专家组的社区老年友好建设指标权重值研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231167984. doi: 10.1177/00469580231167984.
3
Optimization strategy of community planning for environmental health and public health in smart city under multi-objectives.多目标下智慧城市环境卫生与公众健康的社区规划优化策略。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 14;12:1347122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1347122. eCollection 2024.
4
Understanding Aging in Place: Home and Community Features, Perceived Age-Friendliness of Community, and Intention Toward Aging in Place.理解就地养老:家庭和社区特征、社区感知的友好程度以及就地养老的意愿。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jan 14;62(1):46-55. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab070.
5
Examining the relationship between communities' 'age-friendliness' and life satisfaction and self-perceived health in rural Manitoba, Canada.研究加拿大曼尼托巴省农村地区社区的“对老年人友好程度”与生活满意度及自我认知健康之间的关系。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2594. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
6
Research on the establishment of evaluation index system of the aging construction of the community.社区老龄化建设评价指标体系的构建研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;11:1047625. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1047625. eCollection 2023.
7
Construction and improvement strategies of an age-friendly evaluation system for public spaces in affordable housing communities: a case study of Shenzhen.构建和完善适老性平价房社区公共空间评价体系的策略:以深圳为例
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1399852. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399852. eCollection 2024.
8
Using expert decision-making to establish indicators of urban friendliness for walking environments: a multidisciplinary assessment.运用专家决策法建立步行环境的城市友好指标:多学科评估
Int J Health Geogr. 2016 Nov 15;15(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12942-016-0071-7.
9
Research on the Construction of Age-Friendly Community Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model: Evidence from Community in Hefei of China.基于模糊综合评价模型的老年友好型社区建设研究:来自中国合肥社区的证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Sep 14;14:3841-3852. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S324109. eCollection 2021.
10
Measurement Indicators of Age-Friendly Communities: Findings From the AARP Age-Friendly Community Survey.适老社区的衡量指标:来自 AARP 适老社区调查的发现。
Gerontologist. 2022 Jan 14;62(1):e17-e27. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab055.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on the Weighting Values of Community Aging-Friendly Construction Indexes With Different Expert Groups.不同专家组的社区老年友好建设指标权重值研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231167984. doi: 10.1177/00469580231167984.
2
Research on the establishment of evaluation index system of the aging construction of the community.社区老龄化建设评价指标体系的构建研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 7;11:1047625. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1047625. eCollection 2023.
3
A Study on Supply-Demand Satisfaction of Community-Based Senior Care Combined with the Psychological Perception of the Elderly.
基于社区的老年护理供需满意度与老年人心理认知的研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 29;9(6):643. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060643.