• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Research on the Construction of Age-Friendly Community Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model: Evidence from Community in Hefei of China.基于模糊综合评价模型的老年友好型社区建设研究:来自中国合肥社区的证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Sep 14;14:3841-3852. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S324109. eCollection 2021.
2
Research on Evaluation Indexes and Weights of the Aging-Friendly Community Public Environment under the Community Home-Based Pension Model.社区居家养老模式下友好社区公共环境评价指标及权重研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 21;17(8):2863. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082863.
3
Construction and improvement strategies of an age-friendly evaluation system for public spaces in affordable housing communities: a case study of Shenzhen.构建和完善适老性平价房社区公共空间评价体系的策略:以深圳为例
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 18;12:1399852. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399852. eCollection 2024.
4
Research on the Weighting Values of Community Aging-Friendly Construction Indexes With Different Expert Groups.不同专家组的社区老年友好建设指标权重值研究。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231167984. doi: 10.1177/00469580231167984.
5
[Development of comprehensive vitality scale for the elderly based on classical test theory and analytic hierarchy process].基于经典测试理论和层次分析法的老年人综合活力量表的研制
Sheng Li Xue Bao. 2023 Dec 25;75(6):927-936.
6
Evaluating the Risk of Social Isolation in Older People: AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation.评估老年人社会隔离风险:层次分析法-模糊综合评价
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Jan 30;16:79-92. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S383031. eCollection 2023.
7
A Study on Supply-Demand Satisfaction of Community-Based Senior Care Combined with the Psychological Perception of the Elderly.基于社区的老年护理供需满意度与老年人心理认知的研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 May 29;9(6):643. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9060643.
8
Evaluation of the elderly health examination app based on the comprehensive evaluation method of AHP-fuzzy theory.基于层次分析法-模糊理论综合评价方法的老年健康体检 APP 评价。
Math Biosci Eng. 2021 May 31;18(4):4731-4742. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021240.
9
Comprehensive Evaluation of University Safety Culture Construction Level Based on "2-4" Model.基于“2-4”模型的高校安全文化建设水平综合评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316145.
10
Analysis and optimization of 15-minute community life circle based on supply and demand matching: A case study of Shanghai.基于供需匹配的 15 分钟社区生活圈分析与优化——以上海为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 31;16(8):e0256904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256904. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging accessibility gaps in urban community-based basic older adult care: a comprehensive framework validated in Xi'an, China.弥合城市社区基础老年护理中的可及性差距:在中国西安验证的综合框架
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;13:1535987. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1535987. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluating the Risk of Social Isolation in Older People: AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation.评估老年人社会隔离风险:层次分析法-模糊综合评价
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Jan 30;16:79-92. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S383031. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Getting Started: An Empirically Derived Logic Model for Age-Friendly Community Initiatives in the Early Planning Phase.入门指南:早期规划阶段针对友善型社区倡议的经验性推导逻辑模型
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2018 Apr;61(3):295-312. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2018.1432736. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Age-friendly community initiatives: conceptual issues and key questions.老年友好型社区倡议:概念问题与关键问题
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):191-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv005. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
3
An overview of age-friendly cities and communities around the world.世界各地适宜老年人居住的城市和社区概述。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2014;26(1-2):1-18. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2014.860786.
4
Conceptualizing age-friendly communities.概念化老年友好型社区。
Can J Aging. 2011 Sep;30(3):479-93. doi: 10.1017/S0714980811000237. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
5
Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science.测量促进身体活动的建成环境:科学现状
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Apr;36(4 Suppl):S99-123.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.005.
6
Creating elder-friendly communities: preparations for an aging society.创建老年友好型社区:为老龄化社会做准备。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2007;49(1-2):1-18. doi: 10.1300/j083v49n01_01.

基于模糊综合评价模型的老年友好型社区建设研究:来自中国合肥社区的证据

Research on the Construction of Age-Friendly Community Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model: Evidence from Community in Hefei of China.

作者信息

Pan Lin, Sun Jian, Zhou Rongting

机构信息

Department of Basic Education, Party School of Anhui Provincial Committee (Anhui Academy of Governance), Hefei, 230022, People's Republic of China.

Department of Sci-Tech Communication and Policy, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Sep 14;14:3841-3852. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S324109. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S324109
PMID:34548830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8449684/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The construction of an age-friendly community is beneficial to meeting the needs of the elderly and coping with ageing. It is significant to evaluate the quality of age-friendly communities through scientific methods. The study aims to evaluate the livability of communities among the elderly in China.

METHODS

The data used in this study were sourced from the community of Hefei in China, including 1426 participants aged 60 and above. Taking community in Hefei of China as an example, the analytic hierarchy process fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model was used to evaluate the community. Furthermore, this paper constructs an evaluation index system for the livable elderly community and evaluates the comprehensive community system with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.

RESULTS

This study constructs the evaluation index system of an age-friendly community that includes five first-level evaluation indexes and 33 second-level evaluation indexes. The first-level indexe satisfaction from high to low are community safety, community comfort, community health and convenience, and community service. Among them, flat roads (more than 74.3%), greening (more than 78%), quietness (more than 76.8%), health situation (more than 65%), and public transport facilities (more than 66%) were relatively satisfactory. However, in terms of community service, the overall satisfaction of the elderly is not high.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that the level of the age-friendly community in Hefei of China is relatively high. The community safety score is the highest, comfort is relatively high, followed by community health and convenience. The score of community service was low. Moreover, the results indicated that improving the quality of service has become the key to improving the satisfaction of the elderly in the community.

摘要

背景与目的

建设老年友好型社区有利于满足老年人需求、应对老龄化。通过科学方法评估老年友好型社区的质量具有重要意义。本研究旨在评估中国老年人社区的宜居性。

方法

本研究使用的数据来自中国合肥的社区,包括1426名60岁及以上的参与者。以中国合肥的社区为例,采用层次分析法模糊综合评价模型对社区进行评估。此外,本文构建了宜居老年社区评价指标体系,并运用模糊综合评价法对社区综合系统进行评价。

结果

本研究构建了老年友好型社区评价指标体系,包括5个一级评价指标和33个二级评价指标。一级指标满意度由高到低依次为社区安全、社区舒适度、社区健康与便利以及社区服务。其中,平坦道路(超过74.3%)、绿化(超过78%)、安静程度(超过76.8%)、健康状况(超过65%)和公共交通设施(超过66%)相对令人满意。然而,在社区服务方面,老年人的总体满意度不高。

结论

本研究表明,中国合肥老年友好型社区水平较高。社区安全得分最高,舒适度较高,其次是社区健康与便利。社区服务得分较低。此外,结果表明提高服务质量已成为提高社区老年人满意度的关键。