• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手持式和腕戴式现场 PVT 设备与标准化笔记本电脑 PVT 比较。

Hand-Held and Wrist-Worn Field-Based PVT Devices vs. the Standardized Laptop PVT.

出版信息

Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020 May 1;91(5):409-415. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5567.2020.

DOI:10.3357/AMHP.5567.2020
PMID:32327014
Abstract

Given the challenges of collecting reliable Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) data in the field, this study compared a 3-min PVT on a hand-held device and wrist-worn device vs. a standardized laptop. The experiment utilized a randomized, repeated-measures design. Subjects ( = 36) performed the PVT on a touch-screen, hand-held device (HHD), a wrist-worn device (WWD), and a standardized laptop (L). Sleep was assessed using wrist-worn actigraphy. Compared to the L, the HHD was slower on average (∼50% longer reaction times; ∼34% slower response speeds; ∼600% more lapses in attention combined with false starts) and introduced a proportional bias that decreased the range of response speeds by 60%. Compared to the L, the WWD with the backlight on was faster on average (reaction time: ∼6%; response speed: ∼13%), but equivalent in lapses combined with false starts, and introduced a proportional bias that increased the range of responses by 60%. Compared to the L PVT, using a hand-held, touch screen interface to collect PVT data may introduce a large constant bias and a proportional bias that decreases the range of response speed. However, performance on the WWD closely mirrors performance on the L PVT and the proportional bias tends to be in favor of detecting individuals with slower responses. Researchers should avoid comparing PVT metrics between different device types. Reliability of PVT data from a WWD or HHD may be degraded when used in an operational setting with unpredictable environmental movement (such as a surface maritime setting).

摘要

鉴于在现场收集可靠的精神运动警觉任务(PVT)数据的挑战,本研究比较了手持设备和腕戴设备上的 3 分钟 PVT 与标准化笔记本电脑的对比。该实验采用随机重复测量设计。受试者(n=36)在手触屏手持设备(HHD)、腕戴设备(WWD)和标准化笔记本电脑(L)上完成 PVT。使用腕戴活动记录仪评估睡眠。与 L 相比,HHD 的平均速度较慢(反应时间长约 50%;响应速度慢约 34%;注意力不集中和假启动的失误次数多约 600%),并引入了一个比例偏差,使响应速度范围缩小了 60%。与 L 相比,WWD 的背光灯开启时的平均速度较快(反应时间快约 6%;响应速度快约 13%),但在失误和假启动方面相同,并且引入了一个比例偏差,使响应范围扩大了 60%。与 L PVT 相比,使用手持触屏界面收集 PVT 数据可能会引入较大的恒定偏差和比例偏差,从而缩小响应速度范围。然而,WWD 的性能与 L PVT 的性能非常相似,比例偏差往往有利于检测反应较慢的个体。研究人员应避免在不同设备类型之间比较 PVT 指标。在具有不可预测环境运动(如水面航海环境)的操作环境中,WWD 或 HHD 的 PVT 数据可靠性可能会降低。

相似文献

1
Hand-Held and Wrist-Worn Field-Based PVT Devices vs. the Standardized Laptop PVT.手持式和腕戴式现场 PVT 设备与标准化笔记本电脑 PVT 比较。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2020 May 1;91(5):409-415. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5567.2020.
2
Preliminary validation study of the 3-min wrist-worn psychomotor vigilance test.3 分钟腕部式精神运动警觉测试的初步验证研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1792-1801. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0821-2.
3
Validation of a portable, touch-screen psychomotor vigilance test.便携式触摸屏心理运动警觉性测试的验证
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2015 May;86(5):428-34. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4165.2015.
4
3-minute smartphone-based and tablet-based psychomotor vigilance tests for the assessment of reduced alertness due to sleep deprivation.基于智能手机和平板电脑的3分钟心理运动警觉性测试,用于评估因睡眠剥夺导致的警觉性降低。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):1020-1029. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0763-8.
5
Evaluation of a Psychomotor Vigilance Task for Touch Screen Devices.用于触摸屏设备的心理运动警觉任务评估
Hum Factors. 2017 Jun;59(4):661-670. doi: 10.1177/0018720816688394. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
6
Preliminary Agreement on Tracking Sleep Between a Wrist-Worn Device Fitbit Alta and Consensus Sleep Diary.关于腕戴设备Fitbit Alta与睡眠共识日记之间睡眠追踪的初步协议。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Dec;25(12):1189-1197. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0202. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
Fatigue assessment in the field: validation of a hand-held electronic psychomotor vigilance task.现场疲劳评估:手持式电子心理运动警觉任务的验证
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 May;76(5):486-9.
8
Timing and variability of postpartum sleep in relation to daytime performance.产后睡眠的时间和变化与日间表现的关系。
Physiol Behav. 2013 Oct 2;122:134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
9
Test-retest reliability of the 5-minute psychomotor vigilance task in working-aged females.5 分钟精神运动警觉任务在工作年龄段女性中的重测信度。
J Neurosci Methods. 2022 Jan 1;365:109379. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109379. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
10
The effect of split sleep schedules (6h-on/6h-off) on neurobehavioural performance, sleep and sleepiness.分段睡眠时间表(6小时清醒/6小时休息)对神经行为表现、睡眠和嗜睡的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2016 May;54:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 21.