Turner Sarah
Department of Geography, McGill University, 805 Rue Sherbrooke West, Montréal, QC H3A 0B9, Canada.
J Transp Geogr. 2020 May;85:102728. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102728. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
The central government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and Hanoi's municipal authorities are enthusiastically embracing a series of plans and policies for the capital city to create a sustainable mega-city. This state imaginary privileges 'modern' mobilities, championing highways, a bus rapid transport system, and an elevated metro, while so called 'traditional' means of moving around the city such as motorbikes, bicycles, or cyclos are being strongly discouraged and increasingly marginalised. For example, Hanoi officials are implementing a step-wise ban on motorbikes from downtown streets by 2030, while the majority of the urban population travels by motorbike, with about five million motorbikes plying the city's streets. While such an approach not only creates mobility injustice for lower socio-economic residents of the city as a whole, it threatens to undermine the livelihoods of thousands of informal motorbike taxi drivers (locally known as ). In this article I engage with the emerging mobility injustice literature to explore how state discourses regarding urban modernisation are impacting the possibilities for Hanoi's drivers to maintain access to city streets and viable livelihoods. These drivers must negotiate emerging and often conflicting state policies, their enforcement, as well as new app-based competitors, all of which challenge the equitable distribution of motility and produce important frictions. Nonetheless, drivers draw on their agency and creativity during their daily routines to push back, while also creating new narratives regarding their vital role in maintaining neighbourhood security. We thus see how marginalised individuals are counteracting policies they consider unjust, even when this urban agenda is embedded in a politically socialist context.
越南社会主义共和国中央政府和河内市当局积极推行一系列针对首都的计划和政策,以打造一个可持续发展的特大城市。这种国家构想赋予“现代”出行方式特权,推崇高速公路、快速公交系统和高架地铁,而诸如摩托车、自行车或人力三轮车等所谓的“传统”城市出行方式则受到强烈抵制并日益边缘化。例如,河内官员正在逐步实施到2030年禁止摩托车进入市中心街道的禁令,而城市中的大多数人口都以摩托车为出行工具,约有500万辆摩托车穿梭于城市街道。这种做法不仅给整个城市社会经济地位较低的居民造成了出行不公,还可能危及数千名非正规摩托车出租车司机(当地称为“摩的司机”)的生计。在本文中,我结合新兴的出行不公文献,探讨国家关于城市现代化的话语如何影响河内摩的司机维持在城市街道通行及可行生计的可能性。这些司机必须应对新出现且往往相互冲突的国家政策、政策执行情况以及基于应用程序的新竞争对手,所有这些都对出行的公平分配构成挑战并产生重大摩擦。尽管如此,摩的司机在日常工作中发挥自身能动性和创造力进行抵制,同时还创造了关于他们在维护社区安全方面至关重要作用的新叙述。因此,我们看到即使在社会主义政治背景下的城市议程中,被边缘化的个人是如何抵制他们认为不公正的政策的。