Szmatoła Tomasz, Gurgul Artur, Jasielczuk Igor, Fu Weiwei, Ropka-Molik Katarzyna
University Centre of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.
National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Molecular Biology, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.
J Genomics. 2020 Apr 7;8:43-48. doi: 10.7150/jgen.39147. eCollection 2020.
In the present study, runs of homozygosity (ROH) detected with the use of a standard bovine 54k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assay and two different ROH detection approaches, based on 50 (M1) or 15 (M2) consecutive SNPs, were compared with results of whole genome sequencing. Both microarray-based methods accurately recognised medium-sized ROH, however, it was found that M2 method seemed to better than M1 identify short ROH, but highly overestimated their number, leading to numerous false positive calls. Moreover, long ROH identified with microarray data tended to break into shorter segments in sequencing data because of the presence of regions with high heterozygosity within the ROH sequences. This may indicate, that these long ROH are formed by closely positioned shorter homozygous segments that may be of older origin or may be created by two similar but not identical haplotypes, showing minor internal recombination signs. Such finding also suggests that at least some of the results of previous studies in regard to long ROH may be biased leading to inaccurate estimations of genomes autozygosity via ROH classification into length categories.
在本研究中,使用标准的牛54k单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因分型检测方法以及基于50个(M1)或15个(M2)连续SNP的两种不同的纯合性片段(ROH)检测方法所检测到的ROH,与全基因组测序结果进行了比较。两种基于微阵列的方法都能准确识别中等长度的ROH,然而,发现M2方法似乎比M1方法更能识别短ROH,但却高度高估了它们的数量,导致大量假阳性结果。此外,由于ROH序列中存在高杂合性区域,通过微阵列数据识别出的长ROH在测序数据中往往会断裂成较短的片段。这可能表明,这些长ROH是由位置紧密的较短纯合片段形成的,这些片段可能起源较早,或者可能由两个相似但不完全相同的单倍型产生,显示出轻微的内部重组迹象。这一发现还表明,先前关于长ROH的一些研究结果可能存在偏差,导致通过将ROH分类到长度类别中来不准确地估计基因组纯合性。