Suppr超能文献

全国癌胚抗原能力验证试验结果

Results of a nationwide proficiency test for carcinoembryonic antigen.

作者信息

Taylor R N, Fulford K M, Huong A Y

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Apr;5(4):433-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.4.433-438.1977.

Abstract

A proficiency testing survey for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was conducted by the Center for Disease Control. The results from 125 laboratories throughout the United States indicate that many laboratories perform satisfactorily, but some laboratories need substantial improvement. Failure to follow manufacturer's recommendations and failure to heed the indications of "out of control" control results were two of the reasons for poor performance. Results reported for samples with CEA levels of larger than or equal to 20 ng/ml showed that the direct method produced significantly higher values than the indirect method on either whole of diluted plasma. Almost one-fourth of the results reported in this survey were placed in the wrong nominal group. It was determined that the results were log normally distributed and, consequently, that statistical methods that are appropriate for this distribtuion should be used for the analysis of CEA results. Most of the variation observed was the result of poor comparability between laboratories rather than lack of precision within the laboratory. This indicates that better performance could be achieved by better standardization and closer adherence to established procedures.

摘要

疾病控制中心开展了一项癌胚抗原(CEA)能力验证调查。来自美国各地125个实验室的结果表明,许多实验室表现令人满意,但一些实验室需要大幅改进。未遵循制造商的建议以及未留意“失控”质控结果的指示是表现不佳的两个原因。对于癌胚抗原水平大于或等于20 ng/ml的样本所报告的结果显示,直接法在全血或稀释血浆上产生的值显著高于间接法。本次调查中报告的结果几乎四分之一被归入错误的标称组。经确定,结果呈对数正态分布,因此,适用于这种分布的统计方法应被用于癌胚抗原结果的分析。观察到的大多数差异是实验室之间可比性差的结果,而非实验室内部缺乏精密度。这表明,通过更好的标准化和更严格地遵守既定程序可以实现更好的表现。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验