Suppr超能文献

癌胚抗原测量值的差异:调查与对照值对比患者值

Discrepancies in carcinoembryonic antigen measurements: survey and control values vs values for patients.

作者信息

Klee G G, Dodge L A, Reynoso G

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1987 Apr;33(4):563-6.

PMID:3549059
Abstract

We analyzed the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test results reported in the College of American Pathologists' (CAP) surveys to determine the relationship between the source of CEA used to manufacture the survey specimens and the discrepancies among analytical methods. With the 1983 survey specimens, which were prepared from metastatic colon carcinoma, laboratories using Roche RIA with Clinetics columns reported results that were only one-half the values reported by laboratories using the Abbott polyclonal enzyme immunoassay. With the 1984 specimens, prepared from a different metastatic colon carcinoma, and the 1985 specimens, prepared from a tissue-culture source of CEA, the Roche results were about one-sixth as large as the Abbott results. These differences are larger than the reported assay differences for patients' specimens. In addition, twofold proportional differences were found when survey and control specimens were tested with different lots of Abbott polyclonal reagent, whereas only random differences were found with 102 patients' specimens. Evidently, assay systems perform differently with proficiency-testing and control specimens than with patients' specimens.

摘要

我们分析了美国病理学家学会(CAP)调查中报告的癌胚抗原(CEA)检测结果,以确定用于制备调查标本的CEA来源与分析方法之间的差异。对于1983年由转移性结肠癌制备的调查标本,使用带有Clinetics柱的罗氏放射免疫分析(RIA)的实验室报告的结果仅为使用雅培多克隆酶免疫分析的实验室报告值的一半。对于1984年由不同转移性结肠癌制备的标本以及1985年由CEA组织培养来源制备的标本,罗氏的结果约为雅培结果的六分之一。这些差异大于报告的患者标本检测差异。此外,当用不同批次的雅培多克隆试剂检测调查标本和对照标本时,发现了两倍的比例差异,而在102例患者标本中仅发现随机差异。显然,检测系统在能力验证标本和对照标本上的表现与在患者标本上不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验