Suppr超能文献

全科医生对儿童虐待的怀疑:它是如何产生的,后续情况如何?

GPs' suspicion of child abuse: how does it arise and what is the follow-up?

机构信息

CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):117-123. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1755784. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

Abstract

Child abuse is widespread, occurs in all cultures and communities, remains undiscovered in 90% of cases and has serious long-term effects. Physicians generally underidentify and underreport child abuse. To understand this low reporting rate and how the suspicion of child abuse arises, we examined GPs' experiences. How does the suspicion of child abuse arise in GPs' diagnostic reasoning? How do they act upon their suspicion and which barriers do they encounter in their management? Twenty-six GPs participated in four focus groups. We used purposive sampling to include GPs with different levels of experience. We performed a thematic content analysis. Suspicion of child abuse arose from common triggers and a gut feeling that 'something is wrong here'. GPs acted upon their suspicion by gathering more data, through history taking and physical examination. They often found it difficult to decide whether a child was abused, because parents, despite good intentions, may simply lack parenting skills and have different values. Clear signs of sexual abuse and physical violence were institutionally reported by GPs, whereas in less clear-cut cases they followed them up and built a supporting network of professionals around the family. A low child abuse reporting rate by GPs to CACRC does not mean a low detection rate. In trying to improve a child's situation, GPs make use of patients' trust in their doctor by involving other professionals. Awareness of the role of gut feelings in developing a suspicion may increase early detection and preventive actions.Key pointsPhysicians generally underidentify and underreport child abuse.Suspicion of child abuse arose from common triggers and a gut feeling that 'something is wrong here'.GPs acted upon their suspicion by gathering more data, through history taking and physical examination.GPs found it difficult to decide whether a child was abused, because parents, despite good intentions, may lack parenting skills.

摘要

儿童虐待现象普遍存在,发生在所有文化和社区中,90%的案例未被发现,且会产生严重的长期影响。医生通常无法识别和报告儿童虐待情况。为了了解这种低报告率以及儿童虐待的怀疑是如何产生的,我们研究了全科医生的经验。全科医生在诊断推理中是如何产生对儿童虐待的怀疑的?他们如何根据怀疑采取行动,以及在管理过程中遇到哪些障碍?26 名全科医生参加了 4 个焦点小组。我们采用有针对性的抽样方法,包括经验水平不同的全科医生。我们进行了主题内容分析。对儿童虐待的怀疑源于常见的触发因素和一种“这里出了问题”的直觉。全科医生通过询问病史和进行体格检查来收集更多数据,从而根据怀疑采取行动。他们经常发现很难确定孩子是否受到虐待,因为父母尽管有良好的意图,但可能只是缺乏育儿技能和不同的价值观。全科医生会向 CACRC 机构报告明确的性虐待和身体暴力迹象,而在不太明确的情况下,他们会跟进并在家庭周围建立一个专业人员的支持网络。全科医生向 CACRC 儿童虐待报告率低并不意味着检测率低。在努力改善儿童的状况时,医生会利用患者对医生的信任,让其他专业人员参与进来。意识到直觉在产生怀疑中的作用可能会提高早期发现和预防措施的效果。关键点医生通常无法识别和报告儿童虐待情况。对儿童虐待的怀疑源于常见的触发因素和一种“这里出了问题”的直觉。全科医生通过询问病史和进行体格检查来收集更多数据,从而根据怀疑采取行动。医生发现很难确定孩子是否受到虐待,因为父母尽管有良好的意图,但可能只是缺乏育儿技能。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7

本文引用的文献

1
The use of the brief child abuse potential inventory in the general population in Finland.在芬兰普通人群中使用简短儿童虐待倾向量表。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):249-255. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608629. Epub 2019 May 6.
8
Child abuse physicians: coping with challenges.儿童虐待医师:应对挑战。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Jun;36(2):163-73. doi: 10.1177/0163278712459196. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验