Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2020 Apr-Jun;39(2):125-138. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1726150.
This case study describes the process librarians at a large research university used to evaluate a systematic review searching service. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies with a local, health sciences author. Data on librarian involvement, search quality, and standards adherence were recorded. Results of the assessment indicate a gradual increase in librarian authorship or acknowledgement over time, a moderate improvement in adherence to reporting standards over time, and insight into which departments better adhere to standards. Ideas for improving the quality and reach of the service while ensuring sustainability are discussed.
本案例研究描述了一所大型研究型大学的图书馆员用来评估系统评价检索服务的过程。在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 Scopus 中搜索了具有本地、健康科学作者的研究。记录了图书馆员参与、搜索质量和标准遵守的数据。评估结果表明,图书馆员的作者身份或认可逐渐增加,对报告标准的遵守程度随着时间的推移而适度提高,并且深入了解了哪些部门更能遵守标准。讨论了提高服务质量和覆盖面,同时确保可持续性的想法。