Suppr超能文献

通过将图书馆系统评价服务规范化,来增强图书馆员支持的能力并解决协作挑战。

Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services.

机构信息

Health Sciences Librarian, Bracken Health Sciences Library, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada,

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):411-419. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.443. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many health sciences librarians are noticing an increase in demand for systematic review support. Developing a strategic approach to supporting systematic review activities can address commonly reported barriers and challenges including time factors, methodological issues, and supporting student-led projects.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report describes how a health sciences library at a mid-sized university developed and implemented a structured and defined systematic review service in order to build capacity for increased librarian support and to maximize librarians' time and expertise. The process also revealed underlying collaboration challenges related to student-led systematic reviews and research quality concerns that needed to be addressed. The steps for developing a formal service included defining the librarian's role and a library service model, building librarian expertise, developing documentation to guide librarians and patrons, piloting and revising the service model, marketing and promoting the service, and evaluating service usage.

CONCLUSIONS

The two-tiered service model developed for advisory consultation and collaboration provides a framework for supporting systematic review activities that other libraries can adapt to meet their own needs. Librarian autonomy in deciding whether to collaborate on reviews based on defined and explicit considerations was crucial for maximizing librarians' time and expertise and for promoting higher quality research. Monitoring service usage will be imperative for managing existing and future librarian workload. These data and tracking of research outputs from librarian collaborations may also be used to advocate for new librarian positions.

摘要

背景

许多健康科学图书馆员注意到对系统评价支持的需求不断增加。制定支持系统评价活动的战略方法可以解决常见的障碍和挑战,包括时间因素、方法学问题以及支持学生主导的项目。

案例介绍

本案例报告描述了一所中等规模大学的健康科学图书馆如何开发和实施结构化和定义明确的系统评价服务,以提高图书馆员的支持能力,并最大限度地利用图书馆员的时间和专业知识。该过程还揭示了与学生主导的系统评价和研究质量问题相关的潜在合作挑战,这些问题需要加以解决。制定正式服务的步骤包括定义图书馆员的角色和图书馆服务模式、建立图书馆员专业知识、开发指导图书馆员和用户的文档、试点和修改服务模式、宣传和推广服务以及评估服务使用情况。

结论

为咨询和合作开发的两级服务模型为支持系统评价活动提供了一个框架,其他图书馆可以根据自身需求进行调整。图书馆员根据明确的考虑因素自主决定是否合作进行审查,这对于最大限度地利用图书馆员的时间和专业知识以及促进高质量的研究至关重要。监测服务使用情况对于管理现有和未来的图书馆员工作量至关重要。这些数据以及跟踪图书馆员合作产生的研究成果也可用于为新的图书馆员职位争取支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc4/6579587/6f1912a18c22/jmla-107-411-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验