School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Indoor Air. 2020 Sep;30(5):993-1004. doi: 10.1111/ina.12682. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
Bacterial transmission from contaminated surfaces via hand contact plays a critical role in disease spread. However, the fomite-to-finger transfer efficiency of microorganisms during multiple sequential surface contacts with and without gloves has not been formerly investigated. We measured the quantity of Escherichia coli on fingertips of participants after 1-8 sequential contacts with inoculated plastic coupons with and without nitrile gloves. A Bayesian approach was used to develop a mechanistic model of pathogen accretion to examine finger loading as a function of the difference between E coli on surfaces and fingers. We used the model to determine the coefficient of transfer efficiency (λ), and influence of swabbing efficiency and finger area. Results showed that λ for bare skin was higher (49%, 95% CI = 32%-72%) than for gloved hands (30%, CI = 17%-49%). Microbial load tended toward a dynamic equilibrium after four and six contacts for gloved hands and bare skin, respectively. Individual differences between volunteers' hands had a negligible effect compared with use of gloves (P < .01). Gloves reduced loading by 4.7% (CI = -12%-21%) over bare skin contacts, while 20% of participants accrued more microorganisms on gloved hands. This was due to poor fitting, which created a larger finger surface area than bare hands.
通过接触受污染的表面,细菌传播在疾病传播中起着至关重要的作用。然而,在不戴手套和戴手套的情况下,多次连续接触表面时微生物从污染物到手指的转移效率尚未被正式研究过。我们测量了参与者在接触接种过的塑料试片 1-8 次后指尖上大肠杆菌的数量,试片有无戴丁腈手套。采用贝叶斯方法建立了病原体积累的机械模型,以检查手指负荷作为表面和手指之间大肠杆菌差异的函数。我们使用该模型确定了转移效率系数(λ),以及擦拭效率和手指面积的影响。结果表明,裸手的 λ 值更高(49%,95%置信区间 32%-72%),而戴手套的手的 λ 值较低(30%,置信区间 17%-49%)。对于戴手套的手和裸手,分别在进行四次和六次接触后,微生物负荷趋于动态平衡。与使用手套相比,志愿者之间手部的个体差异影响可以忽略不计(P<.01)。与裸手接触相比,手套可减少 4.7%(置信区间-12%-21%)的负荷,而 20%的参与者在戴手套的手上积累了更多的微生物。这是由于手套不合适,导致手指表面积比裸手大。