Suppr超能文献

个性化治疗建议:风险预防指数社交在腰痛运动治疗中的有效性和适用性

Personalized Treatment Suggestions: The Validity and Applicability of the Risk-Prevention-Index Social in Low Back Pain Exercise Treatments.

作者信息

Wippert Pia-Maria, Puschmann Anne-Katrin, Drießlein David, Banzer Winfried, Beck Heidrun, Schiltenwolf Marcus, Schneider Christian, Mayer Frank

机构信息

Sociology of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.

Laboratory of Movement Biomechanics, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 22;9(4):1197. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041197.

Abstract

The back pain screening tool Risk-Prevention-ndex ocial (RPI-S) identifies the individual psychosocial risk for low back pain chronification and supports the allocation of patients at risk in additional multidisciplinary treatments. The study objectives were to evaluate (1) the prognostic validity of the RPI-S for a 6-month time frame and (2) the clinical benefit of the RPI-S. In a multicenter single-blind 3-armed randomized controlled trial, = 660 persons (age 18-65 years) were randomly assigned to a twelve-week uni- or multidisciplinary exercise intervention or control group. Psychosocial risk was assessed by the RPI-S domain social environment (RPI-S) and the outcome pain by the Chronic Pain Grade Questionnaire (baseline M1, 12-weeks M4, 24-weeks M5). Prognostic validity was quantified by the root mean squared error (RMSE) within the control group. The clinical benefit of RPI-S was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA in intervention groups. A subsample of = 274 participants (mean = 38.0 years, SD 13.1) was analyzed, of which 30% were classified at risk in their psychosocial profile. The half-year prognostic validity was good (RMSE for disability of 9.04 at M4 and of 9.73 at M5; RMSE for pain intensity of 12.45 at M4 and of 14.49 at M5). People at risk showed significantly stronger reduction in pain disability and intensity at M4/M5, if participating in a multidisciplinary exercise treatment. Subjects at no risk showed a smaller reduction in pain disability in both interventions and no group differences for pain intensity. Regarding disability due to pain, around 41% of the sample would gain an unfitted treatment without the back pain screening. The RPI-S prognostic validity demonstrated good applicability and a clinical benefit confirmed by a clear advantage of an individualized treatment possibility.

摘要

背痛筛查工具社会风险预防指数(RPI-S)可识别个体慢性背痛的心理社会风险,并支持将有风险的患者分配到额外的多学科治疗中。本研究的目的是评估(1)RPI-S在6个月时间范围内的预后效度,以及(2)RPI-S的临床益处。在一项多中心单盲三臂随机对照试验中,n = 660人(年龄18 - 65岁)被随机分配到为期12周的单学科或多学科运动干预组或对照组。心理社会风险通过RPI-S领域社会环境(RPI-S)进行评估,疼痛结局通过慢性疼痛分级问卷进行评估(基线M1、12周M4、24周M5)。预后效度通过对照组内的均方根误差(RMSE)进行量化。RPI-S的临床益处通过干预组的重复测量方差分析进行计算。对n = 274名参与者的子样本(平均年龄 = 38.0岁,标准差13.1)进行了分析,其中30%在心理社会特征方面被归类为有风险。半年的预后效度良好(M4时残疾的RMSE为9.04,M5时为9.73;M4时疼痛强度的RMSE为12.45,M5时为14.49)。如果参与多学科运动治疗,有风险的人在M4/M5时疼痛残疾和强度的降低明显更强。无风险的受试者在两种干预中疼痛残疾的降低较小,疼痛强度无组间差异。关于因疼痛导致的残疾,如果没有背痛筛查,约41%的样本将接受不适当的治疗。RPI-S的预后效度显示出良好的适用性,临床益处通过个体化治疗可能性的明显优势得到证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a44/7230931/3eac5848fe4e/jcm-09-01197-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验