Safety, Health and Industrial Hygiene Department, Montana Technological University, Butte, MT 59701, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8):2897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082897.
Traditional guidance on ladder safety emphasizes training workers on the use of three points of contact. More recent guidance is to train workers to use three points of control. What is lacking is empirical information about what limb-movement patterns effectively support the use of three points of control. This project was conducted to establish a taxonomy of possible limb-movement patterns and a means for comparing relative safety. Prior to the experiment, a taxonomy of six possible limb-movement patterns was established. A sample of 20 undergraduate students performed four tasks each without any instructions on limb-movement pattern. The tasks were ascending and descending a straight ladder and a portable ladder, once each, while being videotaped. Out of 80 observed tasks, 59 of the subjects were using rungs rather than rails. Analysis of rung users identified the use of all six patterns. An innovative measure of safe performance was developed and used to compare the patterns. Statistical analysis did not find significant differences in the patterns based on the safety performance measure.
传统的梯子安全指南强调对工人进行三点接触使用的培训。最近的指导意见是培训工人使用三点控制。缺乏的是关于哪些肢体运动模式有效地支持三点控制使用的经验信息。本项目旨在建立可能的肢体运动模式分类法和比较相对安全性的方法。在实验之前,建立了六种可能的肢体运动模式的分类法。一组 20 名本科生在没有任何关于肢体运动模式的说明的情况下,每人完成了四项任务。这些任务包括一次爬上和爬下直梯和便携式梯,同时进行录像。在观察到的 80 项任务中,有 59 项任务是使用梯级而不是扶手。对梯级使用者的分析确定了所有六种模式的使用。开发了一种创新的安全性能衡量标准,并用于比较这些模式。统计分析没有发现基于安全性能衡量标准的模式有显著差异。