Hwang Man-Suk, Lee Hye-Yoon, Choi Tae-Young, Lee Jung-Han, Ko Youn-Seok, Jo Dong Chan, Do Kwangsun, Lee Jin-Hyun, Park Tae-Yong
3rd Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan.
School of Korean Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr;99(17):e19837. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019837.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) occurs in 68.1% of patients within the first month of undergoing chemotherapy; however, standardized treatment for CIPN has not been established yet. The efficacy of acupuncture, a widely used treatment for CIPN in South Korea, has not been studied sufficiently. This study aimed to review the studies that evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture or electroacupuncture (EA) in treating CIPN.
A literature search was performed on relevant international databases - MEDLINE, Embase, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Databases, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure - as well as Korean databases - the National Digital Science Library, Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System, DBpia, and Korean Studies Information Service System. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to treat CIPN symptoms with acupuncture or EA and set not only a control group with a conventional pharmacological treatment or injection, but also a placebo control or sham-acupuncture group, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted to elucidate the efficacy of acupuncture/EA on the basis of symptom score.
Of the 13 studies included in the literature review, 12 RCTs compared acupuncture and pharmacological treatments. There were 3 EA RCTs, but only 1 RCT compared EA and sham-EA. A total of 832 participants were included in these studies. Five RCTs showed that acupuncture was more effective than pharmacological treatment in terms of efficacy rate. Regarding the risk of bias summary, the quality of included studies was poor. Only 1 study compared the efficacy of EA and sham EA; therefore, the specific efficacy of acupuncture could not be elucidated.
Acupuncture is safe, but the symptom-alleviating effect on CIPN can hardly be determined because of methodological deficiencies of the included studies. In terms of the clinical efficacy rate, acupuncture was more effective than conventional pharmacological treatments.
CRD42018111509.
化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)在接受化疗的患者中,68.1%会在化疗的第一个月内出现;然而,CIPN的标准化治疗尚未确立。在韩国,针灸是治疗CIPN广泛使用的一种疗法,但其疗效尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在回顾评估针灸或电针(EA)治疗CIPN疗效的研究。
在相关国际数据库——医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、补充与替代医学数据库以及中国知网——以及韩国数据库——国家数字科学图书馆、韩医高级检索集成系统、韩国学术数据库(DBpia)和韩国研究信息服务系统中进行文献检索。纳入旨在用针灸或电针治疗CIPN症状,不仅设置常规药物治疗或注射对照组,还设置安慰剂对照或假针灸组的随机对照试验(RCT)。基于症状评分进行荟萃分析以阐明针灸/电针的疗效。
在文献综述纳入的13项研究中,12项RCT比较了针灸与药物治疗。有3项电针RCT,但只有1项RCT比较了电针与假电针。这些研究共纳入832名参与者。5项RCT表明,在有效率方面针灸比药物治疗更有效。关于偏倚风险总结,纳入研究的质量较差。只有1项研究比较了电针与假电针的疗效;因此,针灸的具体疗效无法阐明。
针灸是安全的,但由于纳入研究的方法学缺陷,对CIPN的症状缓解效果难以确定。就临床有效率而言,针灸比传统药物治疗更有效。
CRD42018111509。