Suppr超能文献

针灸相关干预措施可改善化疗引起的周围神经病变:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Acupuncture-related interventions improve chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, No. 365, Minte Rd., Peitou Dist., Taipei City, 11219, Taiwan.

Department of Nursing, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, No. 289, Jianguo Rd., Xindian Dist., New Taipei City, 23142, Taiwan.

出版信息

BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Aug 19;24(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04603-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The previous effects of acupuncture-related interventions in improving chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms and quality of life (QoL) remain unclear in terms of pairwise comparisons.

AIMS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to determine the hierarchical effects of acupuncture-related interventions on symptoms, pain, and QoL associated with CIPN in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

Nine electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Medline Ovid, Airiti Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Journal full-text database (CJFD), and Wanfang. Medical subject heading terms and text words were used to search for eligible randomized controlled trials published from database inception to May 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies involving 2,027 participants were included. Pairwise meta-analysis revealed that acupuncture-related interventions were superior to usual care, medication, or dietary supplements in improving CIPN symptoms, CIPN pain, and QoL. Furthermore, network meta-analysis indicated that acupuncture plus electrical stimulation (acupuncture-E) had the greatest overall effect among the various interventions. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) revealed that acupuncture-E ranked the highest in improving CINP symptoms. Acupuncture alone was most effective in reducing CIPN pain, and acupuncture plus moxibustion (acupuncture-M) ranked highest in enhancing QoL.

CONCLUSION

This finding suggests that acupuncture-related interventions can provide patients with benefits in improving CIPN symptoms, pain, and QoL. In particular, acupuncture-E could be the most effective approach in which the provided evidence offers diverse options for cancer patients and healthcare professionals.

IMPLICATION FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: These findings provide valuable insights into the potential benefits of acupuncture-related interventions for managing symptoms, pain, and QoL associated with CIPN in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Among the various interventions studied, overall, acupuncture-E had the most significant impact and was effective for a minimum duration of 3 weeks. On the other hand, transcutaneous electrical acupoint/nerve stimulation (TEAS) was identified as a noninvasive and feasible alternative for patients who had concerns about needles or the risk of bleeding. It is recommended that TEAS interventions should be carried out for a longer period, preferably lasting 4 weeks, to achieve optimal outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022319871.

摘要

背景

就两两比较而言,先前关于针刺相关干预措施改善化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)症状和生活质量(QoL)的效果仍不清楚。

目的

本系统评价和网络荟萃分析旨在确定针刺相关干预措施对接受化疗的癌症患者 CIPN 相关症状、疼痛和 QoL 的分层影响。

方法

检索了 9 个电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、EBSCO、Medline Ovid、Airiti 图书馆、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、中国期刊全文数据库(CJFD)和万方。使用医学主题词和文本词搜索从数据库成立到 2023 年 5 月符合条件的随机对照试验。

结果

共纳入 33 项研究,涉及 2027 名参与者。两两荟萃分析显示,针刺相关干预措施在改善 CIPN 症状、CIPN 疼痛和 QoL 方面优于常规护理、药物或膳食补充剂。此外,网络荟萃分析表明,各种干预措施中,针刺加电刺激(针刺-E)的总体效果最大。累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)表明,针刺-E 在改善 CINP 症状方面排名最高。单独针刺在减轻 CIPN 疼痛方面最有效,而针刺加艾灸(针刺-M)在提高 QoL 方面排名最高。

结论

这一发现表明,针刺相关干预措施可为改善 CIPN 症状、疼痛和 QoL 提供患者获益。特别是,针刺-E 可能是最有效的方法,提供的证据为癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员提供了多种选择。

对专业人员和/或患者护理的影响:这些发现为管理接受化疗的 CIPN 相关症状、疼痛和 QoL 提供了有价值的见解。在研究的各种干预措施中,总体而言,针刺-E 的影响最大,并且在至少 3 周的时间内有效。另一方面,经皮穴位/神经电刺激(TEAS)被确定为一种非侵入性且可行的替代方案,适用于对针刺或出血风险有顾虑的患者。建议 TEAS 干预应持续更长时间,最好持续 4 周,以获得最佳效果。

试验注册

该研究方案在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库中注册。

注册号

CRD42022319871。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a57b/11334450/df107b340614/12906_2024_4603_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验