Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Department of Computer Science, Saarland University, Saarbruecken, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 24;10(1):6962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63853-4.
Liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors are nowadays standard in computerized visual presentation. However, when millisecond precise presentation is concerned, they have often yielded imprecise and unreliable presentation times, with substantial variation across specific models, making it difficult to know whether they can be used for precise vision experiments or not. The present paper intends to act as hands-on guide to set up an experiment requiring millisecond precise visual presentation with LCD monitors. It summarizes important characteristics relating to precise visual stimulus presentation, enabling researchers to transfer parameters reported for cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors to LCD monitors. More importantly, we provide empirical evidence from a preregistered study showing the suitability of LCD monitors for millisecond precise timing research. Using sequential testing, we conducted a masked number priming experiment using CRT and LCD monitors. Both monitor types yielded comparable results as indicated by Bayes factor favoring the null hypothesis of no difference between display types. More specifically, we found masked number priming under conditions of zero awareness with both types of monitor. Thus, the present study highlights the importance of hardware settings for empirical psychological research; inadequate settings might lead to more "noise" in results thereby concealing potentially existing effects.
液晶显示器(LCD)如今已成为计算机化视觉呈现的标准设备。然而,当涉及到毫秒级精确呈现时,它们经常提供不准确和不可靠的呈现时间,不同型号之间存在很大差异,使得人们难以确定它们是否可用于精确的视觉实验。本文旨在为使用 LCD 显示器进行需要毫秒级精确视觉呈现的实验提供实际操作指南。它总结了与精确视觉刺激呈现相关的重要特征,使研究人员能够将针对阴极射线管(CRT)显示器报告的参数转换为 LCD 显示器。更重要的是,我们提供了一项预先注册研究的实证证据,表明 LCD 显示器适用于毫秒级精确定时研究。我们使用顺序测试,使用 CRT 和 LCD 显示器进行了掩蔽数字启动实验。两种显示器类型的结果都表明,支持显示类型之间没有差异的零假设的贝叶斯因子有利。更具体地说,我们在两种类型的显示器下都发现了零意识条件下的掩蔽数字启动。因此,本研究强调了硬件设置对于实证心理学研究的重要性;不适当的设置可能会导致结果中出现更多“噪声”,从而掩盖潜在存在的效应。