Department of Radiology, Huadong Hospital (Affiliated to Fudan University), Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiology, Rizhao People's Hospital, Rizhao, China.
J Xray Sci Technol. 2020;28(3):527-539. doi: 10.3233/XST-190624.
Diagnostic quality of computed tomography (CT) images depends on numerous factors. Recently, two different modalities were introduced for coronary CT angiography (CCTA).
This study aims to compare the performance of 16 cm wide-coverage detector CT (WDCT) using the snapshot freeze technique with a new-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) with 66 ms temporal resolution for CCTA.
Total 101 patients with suspected coronary heart disease were enrolled. Of these, 50 and 51 patients were examined on WDCT and DSCT, respectively. CT values, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were measured. The image processing efficiency was recorded, followed by statistical comparison of diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose.
Ninety-nine patients (98.02%) had satisfactory diagnostic image quality. DSCT was significantly better than WDCT in terms of quantitative image quality, image processing efficiency, and qualitative analysis (P < 0.05). However, radiation dose was significantly lower on WDCT (P < 0.05) as compared to DSCT.
Image processing efficiency and image quality of CCTA was higher on DSCT compared to WDCT due to the limitation of maximal tube current of WDCT.
计算机断层扫描(CT)图像的诊断质量取决于众多因素。最近,两种不同的模式被引入用于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)。
本研究旨在比较使用快照冻结技术的 16cm 宽探测器 CT(WDCT)与具有 66ms 时间分辨率的新一代双源 CT(DSCT)在 CCTA 中的性能。
共纳入 101 例疑似冠心病患者。其中,50 例和 51 例患者分别接受 WDCT 和 DSCT 检查。测量 CT 值、图像噪声、信噪比和对比噪声比。记录图像后处理效率,并对诊断准确性和辐射剂量进行统计比较。
99 例(98.02%)患者获得了满意的诊断图像质量。在定量图像质量、图像后处理效率和定性分析方面,DSCT 明显优于 WDCT(P<0.05)。然而,与 DSCT 相比,WDCT 的辐射剂量显著降低(P<0.05)。
由于 WDCT 的最大管电流限制,DSCT 的 CCTA 后处理效率和图像质量高于 WDCT。