• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在无诱因性肺栓塞人群中评估静脉血栓栓塞复发评分:PADIS-PE 试验的事后分析。

Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence Scores in an Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolism Population: A Post-hoc Analysis of the PADIS-PE trial.

机构信息

Département de Médecine Interne et Pneumologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Brest, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, and EA 3878, CIC INSERM 1412, Brest, France; McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Unité de Recherche Clinique, Innovation et Pharmacologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, and INSERM U1059 SAINBIOSE, Université Jean Monnet, France; F-CRIN INNOVTE, Saint Etienne, France.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2020 Aug;133(8):e406-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.040. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.040
PMID:32333853
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed to validate the Men Continue and HERDOO2 (HERDOO2), D-dimer, age, sex, hormonal therapy (DASH), and updated Vienna recurrent venous thromboembolism prediction models in a population composed entirely of first unprovoked pulmonary embolism, and to analyze the impact of the addition of the pulmonary vascular obstruction index (PVOI) on score accuracy.

METHODS

Analyses were based on the double-blind, randomized PADIS-PE trial, which included 371 unprovoked pulmonary embolism patients initially treated for 6 months, successively randomized to receive an additional 18 months of warfarin or placebo, and subsequently followed-up for 2 years.

RESULTS

The HERDOO2, DASH, and updated Vienna scores displayed C-statistics of 0.61 (95% CI 0.54-0.68), 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.66), and 0.58 (95% CI 0.51-0.66), respectively. Only the HERDOO2 score identified low recurrence risk patients (<3%/year) after anticoagulation was stopped. When added to either of the prediction models, PVOI measured at pulmonary embolism diagnosis, after 6 months of anticoagulation, or both, improved scores' C-statistics between +0.06 and +0.11 points and consistently led to identifying at least 50% of patients who experienced recurrence but in whom the scores would have indicated against extended anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a first unprovoked pulmonary embolism, the HERDOO2 score is able to identify patients with a low recurrence risk after treatment discontinuation. Addition of PVOI improves accuracy of all scores.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com. Unique identifier: NCT00740883.

摘要

背景

我们旨在验证完全由首次无诱因性肺栓塞组成的人群中 Men Continue 和 HERDOO2(HERDOO2)、D-二聚体、年龄、性别、激素治疗(DASH)和更新的维也纳复发性静脉血栓栓塞预测模型的有效性,并分析添加肺血管阻塞指数(PVOI)对评分准确性的影响。

方法

分析基于双盲、随机的 PADIS-PE 试验,该试验纳入了 371 例首次无诱因性肺栓塞患者,最初接受 6 个月的治疗,随后连续随机接受 18 个月的华法林或安慰剂治疗,随后随访 2 年。

结果

HERDOO2、DASH 和更新的维也纳评分的 C 统计量分别为 0.61(95%CI 0.54-0.68)、0.60(95%CI 0.53-0.66)和 0.58(95%CI 0.51-0.66)。只有 HERDOO2 评分能够在停止抗凝后识别低复发风险患者(<3%/年)。当添加到任何一种预测模型中时,PVOI 在肺栓塞诊断时、抗凝 6 个月后或两者都测量,可使评分的 C 统计量提高 0.06 至 0.11 点,并始终能够识别至少 50%的复发患者,但这些患者的评分表明应延长抗凝。

结论

在首次无诱因性肺栓塞患者中,HERDOO2 评分能够识别治疗停止后复发风险低的患者。添加 PVOI 可提高所有评分的准确性。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.controlled-trials.com。唯一标识符:NCT00740883。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence Scores in an Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolism Population: A Post-hoc Analysis of the PADIS-PE trial.在无诱因性肺栓塞人群中评估静脉血栓栓塞复发评分:PADIS-PE 试验的事后分析。
Am J Med. 2020 Aug;133(8):e406-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.040. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism after unprovoked pulmonary embolism: the PADIS-PE randomised trial.特发性肺栓塞后复发性静脉血栓栓塞的风险因素:PADIS-PE 随机试验。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jan 4;51(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01202-2017. Print 2018 Jan.
3
Six Months vs Extended Oral Anticoagulation After a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: The PADIS-PE Randomized Clinical Trial.肺栓塞首次发作后 6 个月与延长口服抗凝治疗的比较:PADIS-PE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):31-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.7046.
4
Predictors for Residual Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction after Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolism: Implications for Clinical Practice-The PADIS-PE Trial.特发性肺栓塞后肺血管残余阻塞的预测因素:对临床实践的影响——PADIS-PE 试验。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Sep;119(9):1489-1497. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692424. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
5
External validation of the DASH prediction rule: a retrospective cohort study.DASH 预测规则的外部验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):1963-1970. doi: 10.1111/jth.13781. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
Residual pulmonary embolism as a predictor for recurrence after a first unprovoked episode: Results from the REVERSE cohort study.首次无诱因事件后复发的预测因子:来自 REVERSE 队列研究的结果。
Thromb Res. 2018 Feb;162:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
7
Recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with pulmonary embolism and right ventricular dysfunction: a post-hoc analysis of the Hokusai-VTE study.肺栓塞合并右心室功能不全患者的复发性静脉血栓栓塞:来自北陆-VTE研究的事后分析
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Sep;3(9):e437-45. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30080-1.
8
Prothrombotic Fibrin Clot Phenotype Is Associated With Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism After Discontinuation of Anticoagulant Therapy.促血栓形成的纤维蛋白凝块表型与抗凝治疗中断后复发性肺栓塞相关。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017 Feb;37(2):365-373. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.308253. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
9
Risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after acute pulmonary embolism: Role of residual pulmonary obstruction and persistent right ventricular dysfunction. A meta-analysis.急性肺栓塞后复发性静脉血栓栓塞的风险:残留肺阻塞和持续右心室功能障碍的作用。一项荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Aug;17(8):1217-1228. doi: 10.1111/jth.14477. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
10
Patient-level meta-analysis: effect of measurement timing, threshold, and patient age on ability of D-dimer testing to assess recurrence risk after unprovoked venous thromboembolism.患者水平荟萃分析:D-二聚体检测评估不明原因静脉血栓栓塞后复发风险时,检测时机、阈值和患者年龄对其能力的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 19;153(8):523-31. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Scores in Venous Thromboembolism Guidelines of ESC, ACCP, and ASH: An Updated Review.ESC、ACCP 和 ASH 静脉血栓栓塞症指南中的风险评分:更新综述。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241263856. doi: 10.1177/10760296241263856.
2
Chinese expert consensus on antithrombotic management of high-risk elderly patients with chronic coronary syndrome.中国老年高危慢性冠状动脉综合征患者抗栓治疗管理专家共识
Aging Med (Milton). 2023 Feb 5;6(1):4-24. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12234. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Venous thrombosis and predictors of relapse in eosinophil-related diseases.
静脉血栓形成与嗜酸性粒细胞相关疾病复发的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85852-9.