Tomsk Regional Oncology Centre, 115, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia; Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia.
Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia.
Phys Med. 2020 May;73:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
Introduction Some patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) cannot undergo brachytherapy (BT). Possible treatment includes two-stage external beam radiotherapy (sequential boost - SEQ) or single-stage external beam radiotherapy (simultaneous integrated boost - SIB). The goal of this paper was to carry out dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of these techniques with respect to tumour and organs-at-risk (OARs) irradiation. Methods The anatomic data of six patients with LACC were used for this study. The single-stage SIB-VMAT (25, 27 or 30 fractions) and double-stage SEQ-VMAT (25 + 6 fractions) plans were developed to deliver EQD=50 Gy to the pelvic region and EQD=90 Gy to the tumour. The developed plans were compared with respect to an EQD dose delivered to a tumour and to the OARs, expected tumour control probability and normal tissue complications probability. Results The developed SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT plans had physical coverage of the CTV tumours with more than 95% of the prescribed dose delivered to more than 95% of the volume. The irradiation of the tumour for both SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT has comparable EQD values close to 87-88 Gy. SIB-VMAT treatment plans provided lower levels of irradiation of OARs than SEQ-VMAT plans. The optimal number of fractions for SIB-VMAT was 27. Conclusion SIB-VMAT is a better treatment option for patients with LACC that are not eligible for BT. Results show that both SIB-VMAT and SEQ-VMAT allowed good coverage of the tumour and high-quality dose delivery. SIB-VMAT allowed minimising irradiation of OARs and shortening the overall treatment time by a week.
介绍
一些局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者不能接受近距离放射治疗(BT)。可能的治疗方法包括两阶段外照射放疗(序贯增强 - SEQ)或单阶段外照射放疗(同时整合增强 - SIB)。本文的目的是对这些技术进行剂量学和放射生物学比较,以评估肿瘤和危及器官(OARs)的照射情况。
方法
本研究使用了 6 名 LACC 患者的解剖数据。为了向盆腔区域提供 EQD=50 Gy 和向肿瘤提供 EQD=90 Gy,开发了单阶段 SIB-VMAT(25、27 或 30 个分次)和双阶段 SEQ-VMAT(25+6 个分次)计划。从 EQD 剂量对肿瘤和 OARs 的照射、预期肿瘤控制概率和正常组织并发症概率方面对开发的计划进行了比较。
结果
开发的 SIB-VMAT 和 SEQ-VMAT 计划对 CTV 肿瘤具有物理覆盖,超过 95%的处方剂量输送到超过 95%的体积。对于 SIB-VMAT 和 SEQ-VMAT 两种治疗计划,肿瘤的照射都具有接近 87-88 Gy 的可比 EQD 值。SIB-VMAT 治疗计划对 OARs 的照射水平低于 SEQ-VMAT 计划。SIB-VMAT 的最佳分次数为 27。
结论
SIB-VMAT 是不适合 BT 的 LACC 患者的更好治疗选择。结果表明,SIB-VMAT 和 SEQ-VMAT 都可以很好地覆盖肿瘤,并提供高质量的剂量分布。SIB-VMAT 可以最大限度地减少 OARs 的照射,并通过一周的时间缩短总治疗时间。