• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care.夫妻在生殖保健方面的自主决策。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00470-w.
2
Interest in expanded carrier screening among individuals and couples in the general population: systematic review of the literature.一般人群中个体和夫妇对扩展携带者筛查的兴趣:文献系统评价。
Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Apr 15;26(3):335-355. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa001.
3
Clinical validity and utility of preconception expanded carrier screening for the management of reproductive genetic risk in IVF and general population.体外受精和一般人群中管理生殖遗传风险的孕前扩展携带者筛查的临床有效性和实用性。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun 18;36(7):2050-2061. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab087.
4
Attitudes of the general population towards preconception expanded carrier screening for autosomal recessive disorders including inborn errors of metabolism.一般公众对常染色体隐性疾病(包括先天性代谢缺陷)的扩展性携带者筛查的态度。
Mol Genet Metab. 2019 Jan;126(1):14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
GP-provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why?荷兰一般人群中由全科医生提供的基于夫妇的扩展孕前携带者筛查:谁接受了检测提议,为什么?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Feb;28(2):182-192. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0516-0. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
Values and value conflicts in implementation and use of preconception expanded carrier screening - an expert interview study.在实施和使用孕前扩展性携带者筛查中的价值观和价值冲突——一项专家访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Apr 23;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0362-1.
7
Autonomy and couples' joint decision-making in healthcare.医疗保健中的自主性与夫妻共同决策
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6.
8
Expanded carrier screening for recessively inherited disorders: economic burden and factors in decision-making when one individual in a couple is identified as a carrier.扩展性携带者筛查:当夫妇中一方被确定为携带者时,经济负担和决策因素
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Apr;38(4):957-963. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02084-6. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
9
Attitudes of relatives of mucopolysaccharidosis type III patients toward preconception expanded carrier screening.黏多糖贮积症 III 型患者亲属对孕前扩展携带者筛查的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Oct;28(10):1331-1340. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0648-2. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
10
The aims of expanded universal carrier screening: Autonomy, prevention, and responsible parenthood.扩展普遍携带者筛查的目标:自主性、预防和负责任的育儿。
Bioethics. 2019 Jun;33(5):568-576. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12555. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
When Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Is Diagnosed in Utero: Insights from Two Families.子宫内诊断原发性纤毛运动障碍:来自两个家庭的见解。
Adv Ther. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03298-1.
2
Pregnancy Planning and Genetic Testing: Exploring Advantages, and Challenges.备孕与基因检测:探讨其优势与挑战。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Sep 13;15(9):1205. doi: 10.3390/genes15091205.
3
Non-invasive prenatal testing: a revolutionary journey in prenatal testing.无创产前检测:产前检测领域的革命性历程。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 9;10:1265090. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1265090. eCollection 2023.
4
Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening: A Discourse Analysis of Dutch Webpages.孕前扩展携带者筛查:荷兰网页的话语分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 22;11(10):1511. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101511.
5
Factors associated with young adult engagement with a web-based sickle cell reproductive health intervention.与年轻成年人参与基于网络的镰状细胞生殖健康干预相关的因素。
PEC Innov. 2022 Dec;1. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100063. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
6
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Current Perspectives and Future Challenges.无创产前检测:当前观点与未来挑战
Genes (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;12(1):15. doi: 10.3390/genes12010015.

本文引用的文献

1
Autonomy and couples' joint decision-making in healthcare.医疗保健中的自主性与夫妻共同决策
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6.
2
Swedish healthcare providers' perceptions of preconception expanded carrier screening (ECS)-a qualitative study.瑞典医疗服务提供者对孕前扩展携带者筛查(ECS)的看法——一项定性研究
J Community Genet. 2016 Jul;7(3):203-14. doi: 10.1007/s12687-016-0268-2. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
Informed consent for HPV vaccination: a relational approach.人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的知情同意:一种关系方法。
Health Care Anal. 2015 Mar;23(1):50-62. doi: 10.1007/s10728-012-0237-9.
4
The diversity of regulation and public financing of IVF in Europe and its impact on utilization.欧洲体外受精的监管和公共融资的多样性及其对利用率的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Mar;28(3):666-75. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des418. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
5
Comprehensive carrier screening and molecular diagnostic testing for recessive childhood diseases.针对儿童隐性疾病的综合携带者筛查和分子诊断检测。
PLoS Curr. 2012 May 2;4:e4f9877ab8ffa9. doi: 10.1371/4f9877ab8ffa9.
6
Preconception care and genetic risk: ethical issues.孕前保健与遗传风险:伦理问题
J Community Genet. 2012 Jul;3(3):221-8. doi: 10.1007/s12687-011-0074-9. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
7
Preconception care: a parenting protocol: a moral inquiry into the responsibilities of future parents towards their future children.孕前保健:育儿方案:对未来父母对未来子女的责任的道德探究。
Bioethics. 2011 Oct;25(8):451-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01924.x.
8
Balancing procreative autonomy and parental responsibility.平衡生育自主权与父母责任。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Apr;20(2):268-76. doi: 10.1017/S0963180110000915.
9
Reproductive decision-making: a qualitative study among couples at increased risk of having a child with retinoblastoma.生殖决策:在有生育视网膜母细胞瘤患儿风险增加的夫妇中进行的定性研究。
Clin Genet. 2010 Oct;78(4):334-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01484.x.
10
Conceptualizing couples' decision making in PGD: emerging cognitive, emotional, and moral dimensions.概念化 PGD 中夫妇的决策:新兴的认知、情感和道德维度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Oct;81(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

夫妻在生殖保健方面的自主决策。

Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care.

机构信息

Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00470-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12910-020-00470-w
PMID:32334575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7183638/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening (ECS) is a genetic test offered to a general population or to couples who have no known risk of recessive and X-linked genetic diseases and are interested in becoming parents. A test may screen for carrier status of several autosomal recessive diseases at one go. Such a program has been piloted in the Netherlands and may become a reality in more European countries in the future. The ethical rationale for such tests is that they enhance reproductive autonomy. The dominant conception of autonomy is individual-based. However, at the clinic, people deciding on preconception ECS will be counselled together and are expected to make a joint decision, as a couple. The aim of the present study was to develop an understanding of autonomous decisions made by couples in the context of reproductive technologies in general and of preconception ECS in particular. Further, to shed light on what occurs in reproductive clinics and suggest concrete implications for healthcare professionals.

MAIN TEXT

Based on the shift in emphasis from individual autonomy to relational autonomy, a notion of couple autonomy was suggested and some features of this concept were outlined. First, that both partners are individually autonomous and that the decision is reached through a communicative process. In this process each partner should feel free to express his or her concerns and preferences, so no one partner dominates the discussion. Further, there should be adequate time for the couple to negotiate possible differences and conclude that the decision is right for them. The final decision should be reached through consensus of both partners without coercion, manipulation or miscommunication. Through concrete examples, the suggested notion of couple autonomy was applied to diverse clinical situations.

CONCLUSIONS

A notion of couple autonomy can be fruitful for healthcare professionals by structuring their attention to and support of a couple who is required to make an autonomous joint decision concerning preconception ECS. A normative implication for healthcare staff is to allow the necessary time for decision-making and to promote a dialogue that can increase the power of the weaker part in a relationship.

摘要

背景

孕前扩展携带者筛查 (ECS) 是一项向一般人群或没有隐性和 X 连锁遗传疾病已知风险且有生育意愿的夫妇提供的基因检测。一次检测可以筛查几种常染色体隐性疾病的携带者状态。该计划已在荷兰试行,未来可能在更多欧洲国家成为现实。此类测试的伦理依据是它们增强了生殖自主权。自主的主导概念是基于个体的。然而,在诊所,决定进行孕前 ECS 的人将一起接受咨询,并预计作为夫妻共同做出决定。本研究旨在了解夫妻在生殖技术背景下做出的自主决策,特别是在孕前 ECS 方面。此外,揭示生殖诊所中发生的情况,并为医疗保健专业人员提出具体建议。

主要文本

基于从个体自主到关系自主的重点转移,提出了夫妻自主的概念,并概述了该概念的一些特征。首先,双方都是个体自主的,并且决策是通过沟通过程达成的。在这个过程中,每个伴侣都应该自由地表达自己的担忧和偏好,因此没有一方主导讨论。此外,夫妻双方应该有足够的时间来协商可能存在的分歧,并得出这个决定对他们来说是正确的结论。最终决定应该是双方达成共识,没有胁迫、操纵或误解。通过具体示例,将夫妻自主的概念应用于各种临床情况。

结论

夫妻自主的概念可以为医疗保健专业人员提供有益的指导,帮助他们关注并支持需要就孕前 ECS 做出自主联合决策的夫妻。对医疗保健人员的规范性建议是允许他们有必要的时间做出决策,并促进对话,从而增强关系中较弱一方的权力。