Suppr超能文献

骨水泥固定:是好是坏?使用带开窗螺旋刀片股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的多中心队列研究的中期结果。

Cementation: for better or worse? Interim results of a multi-centre cohort study using a fenestrated spiral blade cephalomedullary device for pertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, 102 Pok Fu Lam Road, Hong Kong, China.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 30 Gascoigne Road, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Dec;140(12):1957-1964. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03449-9. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cephallomedullary nail fixation is currently the most popular treatment for pertrochanteric fractures. Despite continuous improvement in implant design, fixation failures still occur in a concerning number of cases. This study aims to evaluate the effect of cement augmentation of the new-generation Trochanteric Femoral Nail Advanced (TFNA) perforated spiral blade on complications including fixation failure in the elderly population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 107 patients aged 65 + treated for pertrochanteric fractures via TFNA between 2015 and 2019 based on whether cementation was used. Baseline demographics, fracture classifications, and reduction quality were compared. Patients with a follow-up of at least 6 months were analyzed for the primary outcome of fixation failure. All patients, regardless of loss to follow-up within 6 months, were analyzed for other complications including mortality.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (47 cemented, 29 non-cemented) had a minimum follow-up of 6 months (mean 13 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of patient demographics, ASA or AO/OTA fracture classification, reduction quality, or length of follow-up. There was a lower rate of fixation failure in the cement-augmented (CA) group versus the non-cement-augmented (NCA) group (2.1% vs 13.8%; p = 0.047). No cut-out or cut-through was observed in the CA group. Seven patients had adverse intraoperative events, with a significantly higher rate of fixation failure in these patients (40% vs 2.8%; p = 0.00). There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality (6.3% CA vs 4.3% NCA; p = 0.632) or 3-month mortality (9.5% CA vs 12.8% NCA; p = 0.589).

CONCLUSIONS

Cementation of TFNA blades may decrease risk of fixation failure, however, the surgeon must be aware of potential complications such as cement leakage into the hip joint and be able to manage them as they arise.

摘要

介绍

目前,股骨近端髓内钉固定是治疗股骨转子间骨折最流行的方法。尽管不断改进植入物设计,但在相当多的情况下仍会发生固定失败。本研究旨在评估新一代股骨转子间钉高级(TFNA)带孔螺旋刀片的水泥增强对包括老年人群固定失败在内的并发症的影响。

材料和方法

我们回顾性评估了 2015 年至 2019 年期间使用 TFNA 治疗的 107 名 65 岁以上的股骨转子间骨折患者,根据是否使用水泥固定进行分组。比较了基线人口统计学、骨折分类和复位质量。对至少随访 6 个月的患者进行了固定失败的主要结局分析。所有患者,无论 6 个月内是否失访,均分析了其他并发症,包括死亡率。

结果

76 名患者(47 名水泥固定,29 名非水泥固定)的随访时间至少为 6 个月(平均 13 个月)。两组患者在人口统计学特征、ASA 或 AO/OTA 骨折分类、复位质量或随访时间方面无统计学差异。水泥增强(CA)组的固定失败率低于非水泥增强(NCA)组(2.1%比 13.8%;p=0.047)。在 CA 组未观察到切出或穿透。7 名患者发生术中不良事件,这些患者的固定失败率显著更高(40%比 2.8%;p=0.00)。30 天死亡率(CA 组 6.3%,NCA 组 4.3%;p=0.632)和 3 个月死亡率(CA 组 9.5%,NCA 组 12.8%;p=0.589)无统计学差异。

结论

TFNA 刀片的水泥固定可能降低固定失败的风险,但外科医生必须意识到潜在的并发症,如水泥漏入髋关节,并能够在出现并发症时进行处理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验