Mohammadi S-Sina, Phull Sunjeev S, Bal B Sonny, Towler Mark R
Missouri University of Science and Technology, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, 1101 N State St, Rolla, MO, 65409, US.
Orthopedic Surgery Aetna-CVS Health, Columbia, MO, 65211, US.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 8;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05857-2.
Comminuted fractures, characterized by multiple bone fragments, present significant challenges in orthopedic surgery. Effective treatment often requires augmentation techniques to enhance fixation stability and promote bone regeneration. This review explores the application of bone void filler materials, including autografts, allografts, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and synthetic bone substitutes such as calcium phosphate ceramics and bioactive glass, in managing comminuted fractures. Autografts are the gold standard due to their superior osteogenic potential but are limited by donor site morbidity and availability. Allografts mitigate these issues but face concerns regarding immunogenicity and reduced biological activity. PMMA, widely used for structural augmentation, provides immediate stability but suffers from thermal necrosis, polymer shrinkage, and cytotoxic risks. Synthetic bone substitutes, including calcium phosphate cement and bioactive glass, offer promising alternatives by promoting bone integration while reducing complications associated with traditional grafts. However, their mechanical limitations and their artificial nature leave room for improvement. The review highlights recent advancements in biomaterial modifications to improve degradation rates, osteointegration, and mechanical resilience, such as composite materials and ion-doped bio ceramics. Despite these innovations, a gap remains in developing an ideal augmentation material that combines structural integrity with bioactivity. Future research should focus on integrating bioactive elements with load-bearing capabilities to optimize patient outcomes in comminuted fracture management.
粉碎性骨折以多块骨碎片为特征,给骨科手术带来了重大挑战。有效的治疗通常需要采用增强技术来提高固定稳定性并促进骨再生。本综述探讨了骨缺损填充材料在处理粉碎性骨折中的应用,这些材料包括自体骨移植、异体骨移植、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)以及诸如磷酸钙陶瓷和生物活性玻璃等合成骨替代物。自体骨移植因其卓越的成骨潜力而成为金标准,但受到供体部位发病率和可用性的限制。异体骨移植可缓解这些问题,但存在免疫原性和生物活性降低的顾虑。广泛用于结构增强的PMMA可提供即时稳定性,但存在热坏死、聚合物收缩和细胞毒性风险。包括磷酸钙骨水泥和生物活性玻璃在内的合成骨替代物通过促进骨整合,同时减少与传统移植物相关的并发症,提供了有前景的替代方案。然而,它们的机械局限性及其人工性质仍有改进空间。该综述强调了生物材料改性方面的最新进展,以提高降解速率、骨整合和机械弹性,如复合材料和离子掺杂生物陶瓷。尽管有这些创新,但在开发一种将结构完整性与生物活性相结合的理想增强材料方面仍存在差距。未来的研究应侧重于将生物活性元素与承重能力相结合,以优化粉碎性骨折治疗中的患者预后。