• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙骨折联络服务的最佳实践框架及其与初级保健的协调。

Best Practice Framework of Fracture Liaison Services in Spain and their coordination with Primary Care.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Doctor Negrin University Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

Bone Metabolism Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, "Virgen Macarena" University Hospital, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Apr 25;15(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0693-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11657-020-0693-z
PMID:32335759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7183494/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The coordination of Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) with Primary Care (PC) is necessary for the continuity of care of patients with fragility fractures. This study proposes a Best Practice Framework (BPF) and performance indicators for the implementation and follow-up of FLS-PC coordination in clinical practice in Spain.

PURPOSE

To develop a BPF for the coordination of FLS with PC in Spain and to improve the continuity of care for patients with fragility fractures.

METHODS

A Steering Committee selected experts from seven Spanish FLS and related PC doctors and nurses to participate in a best practice workshop. Selection criteria were an active FLS with an identified champion and prior contact with PC centres linked to the hospital. The main aim of the workshop was to review current FLS practices in Spain and their integration with PC. A BPF document with processes, tools, roles, and metrics was then generated.

RESULTS

Spanish FLS consists of a multidisciplinary team of physicians/nurses but with low participation of other professionals and PC staff. Evaluation and treatment strategies are widely variable. Four desired standards were agreed upon: (1) Effective channels for FLS-PC communication; (2) minimum contents of an FLS clinical report and its delivery to PC; (3) adherence monitoring 3 months after FLS baseline visit; and (4) follow-up by PC. Proposed key performance indicators are (a) number of FLS-PC communications, including consensus protocols; (b) confirmation FLS report received by PC; (c) medical/nursing PC appointment after FLS report received; and (d) number of training sessions in PC.

CONCLUSIONS

The BPF provides a comprehensive approach for FLS-PC coordination in Spain, to promote the continuity of care in patients with fragility fractures and improve secondary prevention. The implementation of BPF recommendations and performance indicator tracking will benchmark best FLS practices in the future.

摘要

目的

制定西班牙骨折联络服务(FLS)与初级保健(PC)协调的最佳实践框架(BPF),以改善脆性骨折患者的护理连续性。

方法

指导委员会从 7 个西班牙 FLS 和相关的 PC 医生和护士中选择专家参加最佳实践研讨会。选择标准是具有确定的拥护者的活跃 FLS 以及与医院相关的 PC 中心的先前联系。研讨会的主要目的是审查西班牙当前的 FLS 实践及其与 PC 的整合。然后生成了一份包含流程、工具、角色和指标的 BPF 文件。

结果

西班牙 FLS 由医生/护士组成的多学科团队组成,但其他专业人员和 PC 工作人员的参与度较低。评估和治疗策略差异很大。达成了四项预期标准:(1)FLS-PC 沟通的有效渠道;(2)FLS 临床报告的最低内容及其向 PC 的传递;(3)FLS 基线就诊后 3 个月的依从性监测;(4)PC 随访。建议的关键绩效指标是(a)FLS-PC 沟通次数,包括共识协议;(b)确认 PC 收到 FLS 报告;(c)收到 FLS 报告后 PC 安排医疗/护理预约;(d)PC 培训课程的数量。

结论

BPF 为西班牙 FLS-PC 协调提供了一种全面的方法,以促进脆性骨折患者的护理连续性并改善二级预防。未来,BPF 建议的实施和绩效指标跟踪将成为最佳 FLS 实践的基准。

相似文献

1
Best Practice Framework of Fracture Liaison Services in Spain and their coordination with Primary Care.西班牙骨折联络服务的最佳实践框架及其与初级保健的协调。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Apr 25;15(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0693-z.
2
Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture® Best Practice Framework tool.有效的继发性骨折预防:使用国际骨质疏松症基金会(IOF)“抓住骨折®”最佳实践框架工具实施临床质量的全球基准评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Nov;26(11):2573-8. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3192-0. Epub 2015 Jun 13.
3
Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle.捕获骨折:打破脆性骨折周期的最佳实践框架和全球运动。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Aug;24(8):2135-52. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
4
Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region.亚太地区骨折联络服务最佳实践标准共识。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 May 12;13(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0463-3.
5
Lessons Learned: Evaluation of Fracture Liaison Service Quality Improvement Efforts in a Large Academic Healthcare System.经验教训:在大型学术医疗保健系统中评估骨折联络服务质量改进工作。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jun;39(8):1407-1413. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08568-8. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
6
Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.西班牙主要骨质疏松性骨折登记处(REFRA)在骨折联络服务(FLS)中的应用:目标和质量标准。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Nov 1;17(1):138. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01174-x.
7
Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.西澳骨质疏松症护理模式的实施:利用急诊信息系统识别脆性骨折患者的骨折联络服务,以改善当前实践并降低再骨折率:为期 12 个月的分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1759-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.亚太地区脆性骨折的二级预防:一项教育举措。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):805-826. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05197-y. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
9
Establishing a fracture liaison service: an orthopaedic approach.建立骨折联络服务:一种骨科方法。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 15;97(8):675-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00957.
10
Establishing consensus recommendations for long-term osteoporosis care for patients who have attended an Australian fracture liaison service: a Delphi study.制定澳大利亚骨折联络服务就诊患者长期骨质疏松症护理的共识建议:一项德尔菲研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07014-7. Epub 2024 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Family physicians' attitudes and practice on screening and prevention of fragility fractures, and shared decision-making with postmenopausal women: a qualitative study in Spain.家庭医生对脆性骨折筛查与预防的态度及实践,以及与绝经后女性的共同决策:西班牙的一项定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 20;26(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02966-z.
2
Recommendations for the prevention of fragility fractures: a consensus from international experts and Ibero-American scientific societies.预防脆性骨折的建议:国际专家和伊比利亚美洲科学协会的共识
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Jun 12;20(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01551-2.
3
Construction of Fracture Liaison Service Scheme Under Medical Alliance Framework in China: A Modified Delphi Method Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy, cost, and aspects to take into account in the treatment of osteoporosis in the elderly.老年人骨质疏松症治疗中的疗效、成本及需考虑的方面。
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2019 May-Jun;54(3):156-167. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
2
Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region.亚太地区骨折联络服务最佳实践标准共识。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 May 12;13(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0463-3.
3
Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
中国医疗联盟框架下骨折联络服务方案的构建:一项改良德尔菲法研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Apr 18;18:2201-2213. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S481843. eCollection 2025.
4
Acceptability and Appropriateness of Patientcentered, Family-focused, Community-oriented (PFC) Lens in the Ortho-Geriatric Fracture Liaison Service among Family and Community Medicine Trainees.以患者为中心、以家庭为重点、以社区为导向(PFC)视角在家庭与社区医学实习生的骨科-老年骨折联络服务中的可接受性与适宜性
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Jul 31;58(13):22-28. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i13.8110. eCollection 2024.
5
Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review.初级保健中的二次骨折预防:叙述性综述。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Aug;35(8):1359-1376. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07036-1. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Establishing consensus recommendations for long-term osteoporosis care for patients who have attended an Australian fracture liaison service: a Delphi study.制定澳大利亚骨折联络服务就诊患者长期骨质疏松症护理的共识建议:一项德尔菲研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07014-7. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
7
A Delphi consensus on the management of Spanish patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture: OSARIDELPHI study.德尔福共识:西班牙高骨折风险骨质疏松症患者的管理:OSARIDELPHI 研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Aug 23;18(1):110. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01318-7.
8
Approach to the Patient With Bone Fracture: Making the First Fracture the Last.骨折患者的处理方法:让首次骨折成为最后一次骨折。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Nov 17;108(12):3345-3352. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad345.
9
Spanish National Registry of Major Osteoporotic Fractures (REFRA) seen at Fracture Liaison Services (FLS): objectives and quality standards.西班牙主要骨质疏松性骨折登记处(REFRA)在骨折联络服务(FLS)中的应用:目标和质量标准。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Nov 1;17(1):138. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01174-x.
10
EVALUATION OF POST-SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF FRAGILITY FRACTURES.脆性骨折术后管理的评估
Acta Ortop Bras. 2021 May-Jun;29(3):137-142. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220212903242944.
骨折联络服务可改善骨质疏松性骨折患者的结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Bone. 2018 Jun;111:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review.亚太地区骨质疏松性骨折联络服务:当前未满足的需求和系统文献回顾。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):779-792. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4347-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Secondary fracture prevention in hip fracture patients requires cooperation from general practitioners.髋部骨折患者的二次骨折预防需要全科医生的配合。
Arch Osteoporos. 2017 May 18;12(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0346-z.
6
Identification and management of patients at increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: outcomes of an ESCEO expert consensus meeting.识别和管理具有骨质疏松性骨折风险增加的患者:ESCEO 专家共识会议的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jul;28(7):2023-2034. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4009-0. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
7
Fracture Liaison Services.骨折联络服务
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017 Jul;29(4):416-421. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000401.
8
An overview and management of osteoporosis.骨质疏松症概述与管理
Eur J Rheumatol. 2017 Mar;4(1):46-56. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2016.048. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
9
Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.关注(治疗)差距:关于预防脆性骨折的当前及未来策略的全球视角
Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1507-1529. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3894-y. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
10
The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide.脆性骨折的影响及全球骨质疏松风险评估方法。
Bone. 2017 Nov;104:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Jan 22.