Nicolela Susanna Fernanda, Pavesio Carlos
Medicine School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2020 Apr 27;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12348-020-00202-6.
The recent introduction of biological agents has revolutionized the treatment of chronic immune-inflammatory diseases; however, this new therapy did not come without significant side effects.Through large controlled studies indicating decrease in the number of uveitis flares, the role of TNF inhibitors therapy for non-infectious uveitis gained more ground. Paradoxically to its therapeutic effect, there are reports associating these drugs with the onset or recurrence of inflammatory eye disease.A number of studies have suggested possible roles for anti-TNF-α agents in precipitating or worsening an underlying inflammatory process, including the hypothesis of a disequilibrium in cytokine balance, but to date the mechanisms responsible for these adverse events are not fully understood.A PubMed literature search was performed using the following terms: ophthalmic complication, uveitis, inflammatory eye disease, optic neuritis, neuropathy, adverse events, anti-TNF, TNF alpha inhibitor, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab, and biologics. The data presented in this study was mainly derived from the use of TNF inhibitors in rheumatology, essentially because these drugs have been used for a longer period in this medical field.Many of the ocular adverse events reported on this review may be considered a paradoxical effect of anti-TNF therapy. We found a variety of data associating new onset of uveitis with anti-TNF therapy for rheumatic conditions, predominantly under etanercept.In conclusion, although there is increasing data on ocular adverse events, it remains to be seen whether the suggested link between TNF inhibitors and the onset of ocular inflammation is substantiated by more quality data. Nevertheless, the awareness of potential treatment side effects with anti-TNF should be highlighted.
生物制剂的近期引入彻底改变了慢性免疫炎症性疾病的治疗方式;然而,这种新疗法并非没有显著的副作用。通过大型对照研究表明葡萄膜炎发作次数减少,肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂疗法在非感染性葡萄膜炎治疗中的作用得到了更多认可。与其治疗效果相悖的是,有报告将这些药物与炎症性眼病的发作或复发联系起来。一些研究表明抗TNF-α药物在引发或加重潜在炎症过程中可能发挥作用,包括细胞因子平衡失调的假说,但迄今为止,这些不良事件的发生机制尚未完全明确。使用以下检索词在PubMed上进行了文献检索:眼科并发症、葡萄膜炎、炎症性眼病、视神经炎、神经病变、不良事件、抗TNF、TNF-α抑制剂、英夫利昔单抗、依那西普、阿达木单抗、戈利木单抗、赛妥珠单抗和生物制剂。本研究中呈现的数据主要源于TNF抑制剂在风湿病学中的应用,主要是因为这些药物在该医学领域使用的时间更长。本综述中报告的许多眼部不良事件可能被视为抗TNF治疗的矛盾效应。我们发现了各种数据,将葡萄膜炎的新发与用于治疗风湿性疾病的抗TNF治疗相关联,主要是在使用依那西普的情况下。总之,尽管关于眼部不良事件的数据越来越多,但TNF抑制剂与眼部炎症发作之间的假定联系是否能得到更多高质量数据的证实仍有待观察。然而,应强调对抗TNF潜在治疗副作用的认识。