From the, Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Human Resources, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;27(10):1051-1058. doi: 10.1111/acem.13998. Epub 2020 May 14.
The American College of Emergency Physicians' geriatric emergency department (GED) guidelines recommend additional staff and geriatric equipment, which may not be financially feasible for every ED. Data from an accredited Level 1 GED was used to report equipment costs and to develop a business model for financial sustainability of a GED.
Staff salaries including the cost of fringe benefits were obtained from a Midwestern hospital with an academic ED of 80,000 annual visits. Reimbursement assumptions included 100% Medicare/Medicaid insurance payor and 8-hour workdays with 4.5 weeks of leave annually. Equipment costs from hospital invoices were collated. Operational and patient safety metrics were compared before and after the GED.
A geriatric nurse practitioner in the ED is financially self-sustaining at 7.1 consultations, a pharmacist is self-sustaining at 7.7 medication reconciliation consultations, and physical and occupational therapist evaluations are self-sustaining at 5.7 and 4.6 consults per workday, respectively. Total annual equipment costs for mobility aids, delirium aids, sensory aids, and personal care items for the GED was $4,513. Comparing the 2 years before and after, in regard to operational metrics the proportions of patients with lengths of stay > 8 hours and patients placed in observation did not change. In regard to patient safety, the rate of falls decreased from 0.60/1,000 patient visits to 0.42/1,000 in the ED observation unit and 0.42/1,000 to 0.36/1,000 in the ED. ED recidivism at 7 and 30 days did not change. Estimated cost savings from the reduction in falls was $80,328.
The additional equipment and personnel costs for comprehensive geriatric assessment in the ED are potentially financially justified by revenue generation and improvements in patient safety measures. A geriatric ED was associated with a decrease in patient falls in the ED but did not decrease admissions or ED recidivism.
美国急诊医师学院的老年急诊部 (GED) 指南建议增加额外的人员和老年设备,这对于每个急诊部来说可能在财务上不可行。使用经过认证的一级 GED 的数据报告设备成本,并为 GED 的财务可持续性制定商业模式。
从一家中西部医院的学术急诊部(每年有 80,000 次就诊)获得员工工资(包括福利费用)。报销假设包括 100% 的医疗保险/医疗补助保险支付者和每年 8 小时工作日和 4.5 周休假。从医院发票中整理设备成本。比较 GED 前后的运营和患者安全指标。
在 ED 中,一名老年执业护士在进行 7.1 次咨询时可以实现财务自给自足,一名药剂师在进行 7.7 次药物重整咨询时可以实现财务自给自足,物理治疗师和职业治疗师的评估在每个工作日分别进行 5.7 和 4.6 次咨询时可以实现财务自给自足。GED 的移动辅助设备、谵妄辅助设备、感觉辅助设备和个人护理用品的年度设备总成本为 4513 美元。比较前后两年,在运营指标方面,停留时间超过 8 小时的患者比例和观察患者比例没有变化。在患者安全方面,跌倒率从 ED 观察病房的每 1000 次就诊 0.60 下降到 0.42,从 ED 观察病房的每 1000 次就诊 0.42 下降到 0.36。7 天和 30 天的 ED 复发率没有变化。因跌倒减少而节省的估计成本为 80,328 美元。
ED 中全面老年评估的额外设备和人员成本通过收入增加和患者安全措施的改善在财务上是合理的。老年 ED 与 ED 患者跌倒减少有关,但并未减少入院或 ED 复发率。