Jukic Ivan, García-Ramos Amador, Malecek Jan, Omcirk Dan, Tufano James J
Sport Performance Research Institute New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 May 1;36(5):1177-1184. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003608. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
Jukic, I, García-Ramos, A, Malecek, J, Omcirk, D, and Tufano, JJ. Magnitude and reliability of velocity and power variables during deadlifts performed with and without lifting straps. J Strength Cond Res 36(5): 1177-1184, 2022-This study aimed to compare the magnitude and reliability of mean velocity (MV), peak velocity (PV), mean power (MP), and peak power (PP) between deadlifts performed with (DLw) and without (DLn) lifting straps. Sixteen resistance-trained men performed a DLn 1-repetition maximum (1RM) session followed by 4 experimental sessions (2 with each deadlift variant in a randomized order). Each experimental session comprised lifts at 20, 40, 60, and 80% of the DLn 1RM. No significant differences were found between DLw and DLn for MV, MP, PV, and PP at any load (p = 0.309-1.00; g = 0.00-0.19). All mechanical variables showed an acceptable reliability for both deadlift conditions at each relative load (coefficient of variation [CV] <8%; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.70; g < 0.5) with the only exception of MV at 60% 1RM for DLw (ICC = 0.62) and at 40% 1RM for DLn (ICC = 0.65). Furthermore, MV and PV generally had lower within-subject CV (CV = 3.56-5.86%) than MP and PP (CV = 3.82-8.05%) during both deadlift conditions. Our findings suggest that sport professionals might not need to consider implementing lifting straps with the aim to maximize velocity and power outputs with submaximal loads in a deadlift exercise. Because all mechanical variables measured showed an acceptable level of reliability for both DLw and DLn, they can all be used to track changes in performance during the deadlift exercise. However, velocity variables were slightly more consistent (lower CV), which makes them more appropriate to track DLw and DLn performance changes.
尤基奇、I、加西亚 - 拉莫斯、A、马莱切克、J、奥姆西尔克、D和图法诺、JJ。使用和不使用举重腰带进行硬拉时速度和功率变量的大小及可靠性。《力量与体能研究杂志》36(5): 1177 - 1184,2022 - 本研究旨在比较使用(DLw)和不使用(DLn)举重腰带进行硬拉时平均速度(MV)、峰值速度(PV)、平均功率(MP)和峰值功率(PP)的大小及可靠性。16名经过抗阻训练的男性先进行了一次不使用腰带的1次重复最大重量(1RM)测试,随后进行4次实验测试(每种硬拉变体各2次,随机顺序)。每次实验测试包括以不使用腰带的1RM的20%、40%、60%和80%的重量进行的举重。在任何负荷下,使用腰带和不使用腰带的硬拉在MV、MP、PV和PP方面均未发现显著差异(p = 0.309 - 1.00;g = 0.00 - 0.19)。在每个相对负荷下,两种硬拉条件下所有力学变量均显示出可接受的可靠性(变异系数[CV] <8%;组内相关系数[ICC] > 0.70;g < 0.5),唯一的例外是使用腰带的硬拉在60% 1RM时的MV(ICC = 0.62)和不使用腰带的硬拉在40% 1RM时的MV(ICC = 0.65)。此外,在两种硬拉条件下,MV和PV的受试者内CV(CV = 3.56 - 5.86%)通常低于MP和PP(CV = 3.82 - 8.05%)。我们的研究结果表明,体育专业人员可能无需考虑使用举重腰带,以期在硬拉练习中使用次最大负荷时最大化速度和功率输出。因为所测量的所有力学变量在使用腰带和不使用腰带的硬拉中均显示出可接受的可靠性水平,所以它们均可用于追踪硬拉练习中的性能变化。然而,速度变量的一致性稍高(CV较低),这使得它们更适合追踪使用腰带和不使用腰带的硬拉的性能变化。