Miras-Moreno Sergio, García-Ramos Amador, Rojas-Ruiz Francisco J, Pérez-Castilla Alejandro
Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Conditioning, Faculty of Education, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Sports Health. 2025 Mar;17(2):332-341. doi: 10.1177/19417381241235163. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
Fastest mean (MV) and peak (PV) velocity of the set have been proposed to predict the maximum number of repetitions to failure (RTF) during the Smith machine prone bench pull (PBP) exercise.
Goodness-of-fit would be higher for individualized compared with generalized RTF-velocity relationships and comparable for both execution equipment conditions (with or without straps), and the MV and PV associated with each RTF would be comparable between execution equipment and prediction methods (multiple- vs 2-point method).
Cross-sectional study.
Level 3.
After determining the PBP 1-repetition maximum (1RM), 20 resistance-trained male athletes performed 2 sessions randomly, with and without lifting straps, consisting of single sets to failure against the same load sequence (60% to 80% to 70% 1RM). Generalized (pooling data from all subjects) and individualized (separately for each subject using multiple-point or 2-point methods) RTF-velocity relationships were constructed.
Individualized RTF-velocity relationships were always stronger than generalized RFT-velocity relationships, but comparable with (MV: = 0.87-0.99]; PV: = 0.88-1.00]) and without (MV: = 0.82-1.00; PV: = 0.89-0.99]) lifting straps. The velocity values associated with each RTF were comparable between execution equipment ( ≥ 0.22), but higher for the multiple-point compared with the 2-point method ( < 0.01).
The use of lifting straps during the Smith machine PBP exercise does not affect the goodness-of-fit of the RTF-velocity relationships or the velocity values associated with different RTFs. However, caution should be exercised when using different methods.
The benefits of the RTF-velocity relationships can be extrapolated when using lifting straps, and the 2-point method can also be used as a quick and more fatigue-free procedure. Nevertheless, it is imperative for coaches to ensure that these relationships are reflective of fatigue experienced during training.
有人提出一组动作的最快平均速度(MV)和峰值速度(PV)可用于预测史密斯机俯卧卧推(PBP)运动中至疲劳的最大重复次数(RTF)。
与一般化的RTF-速度关系相比,个性化的RTF-速度关系的拟合优度更高,并且在两种执行设备条件(使用或不使用护腕)下具有可比性,并且与每个RTF相关的MV和PV在执行设备和预测方法(多点法与两点法)之间具有可比性。
横断面研究。
3级。
在确定PBP的1次重复最大值(1RM)后,20名经过抗阻训练的男性运动员随机进行2组训练,一组使用护腕,一组不使用护腕,每组均针对相同的负荷顺序(60%至80%至70%的1RM)进行单组至疲劳训练。构建了一般化(汇总所有受试者的数据)和个性化(使用多点法或两点法分别针对每个受试者)的RTF-速度关系。
个性化的RTF-速度关系始终比一般化的RTF-速度关系更强,但在使用护腕(MV: = 0.87 - 0.99];PV: = 0.88 - 1.00])和不使用护腕(MV: = 0.82 - 1.00;PV: = 0.89 - 0.99])的情况下具有可比性。与每个RTF相关的速度值在执行设备之间具有可比性( ≥ 0.22),但多点法的速度值高于两点法( < 0.01)。
在史密斯机PBP运动中使用护腕不会影响RTF-速度关系的拟合优度或与不同RTF相关的速度值。然而,使用不同方法时应谨慎。
使用护腕时可以推断RTF-速度关系的益处,两点法也可作为一种快速且更不易疲劳的方法。尽管如此,教练必须确保这些关系反映训练期间经历的疲劳。