• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒适区迁移与公共土地:保护区的兴起。

Amenity Migration and Public Lands: Rise of the Protected Areas.

机构信息

Conservation Economics Institute, Twin Falls, ID, USA.

U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2020 Jul;66(1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01293-6. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-020-01293-6
PMID:32342147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7185266/
Abstract

Rural amenity migration, or the relocation for quality of life purposes as opposed to monetary enhancement, has been occurring for decades and has been particularly pronounced in the American West where the phenomenon peaked in the 1990s. Researchers have illustrated that some places are more attractive for migrants than others and that certain regional amenities hold considerable influence on where migrants relocate. Increased migration levels typically result in increased economic growth indicators, making amenity migration an attractive rural development strategy. But comprehensive econometric analysis focused on amenity migration in the American West has been lacking. To address this, we conducted an econometric analysis of attributes that influenced migration to rural Western counties from 1980 to 2010. Over 20 potential amenity supply categories were collated for 356 rural counties from 11 Western states, with a focus on public lands. Descriptive statistics and OLS regressions were estimated and interpreted. Traditional amenities of climate, water area, and regional access were highly associated with migration levels, while designated natural amenities of Wilderness and National Monuments were the most influential public lands for migration to rural Western counties. Farming and oil and gas dependency were negatively associated with migration levels. Increasing the amount of protected areas, and branding campaigns based on natural amenities, can be a critical development strategy for rural communities.

摘要

农村吸引力迁移,即出于生活质量而非经济改善的目的进行迁移,已经持续了几十年,在美国西部尤为明显,这一现象在 20 世纪 90 年代达到顶峰。研究人员表明,与其他地区相比,某些地方对移民更具吸引力,某些地区的特色设施对移民的迁移地点有很大影响。移民水平的增加通常会导致经济增长指标的增加,因此农村吸引力迁移是一种有吸引力的农村发展战略。但是,对美国西部农村吸引力迁移的综合计量经济学分析一直缺乏。为了解决这个问题,我们对 1980 年至 2010 年影响农村西部县移民的因素进行了计量经济学分析。在 11 个西部州的 356 个农村县,收集了 20 多种潜在的公共设施供应类别,重点是公共土地。我们进行了描述性统计和 OLS 回归估计和解释。气候、水域和区域可达性等传统特色设施与移民水平高度相关,而荒野和国家纪念碑等指定的自然特色设施是吸引农村西部县移民的最具影响力的公共土地。农业和石油天然气依赖与移民水平呈负相关。增加保护区数量,以及基于自然特色设施的品牌推广活动,可以成为农村社区发展的关键战略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/65f0179a6210/267_2020_1293_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/96dc53abe928/267_2020_1293_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/942bbea310ae/267_2020_1293_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/65f0179a6210/267_2020_1293_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/96dc53abe928/267_2020_1293_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/942bbea310ae/267_2020_1293_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e803/7185266/65f0179a6210/267_2020_1293_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Amenity Migration and Public Lands: Rise of the Protected Areas.舒适区迁移与公共土地:保护区的兴起。
Environ Manage. 2020 Jul;66(1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01293-6. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Measuring the attractiveness of rural communities in accounting for differences of rural primary care workforce supply.衡量农村社区在解释农村初级保健劳动力供应差异方面的吸引力。
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):3925. doi: 10.22605/RRH3925. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
3
Responding to population pressure in the rural Kenya.应对肯尼亚农村的人口压力。
GeoJournal. 1993 Aug;30(4):409-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00807222.
4
Multinomial logistic models explaining income changes of migrants to high-amenity counties.解释向高宜居性县迁移者收入变化的多项逻辑模型。
Rev Reg Stud. 1992 Summer;22(1):25-42.
5
Housing growth, forests, and public lands in Northern Wisconsin from 1940 to 2000.1940年至2000年威斯康星州北部的住房增长、森林和公共土地。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jun;90(8):2690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.02.012. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
6
Urban amenity and settlement intentions of rural-urban migrants in China.中国城乡移民的城市舒适性与定居意愿。
PLoS One. 2019 May 13;14(5):e0215868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215868. eCollection 2019.
7
Interregional migration of labor in Ghana, West Africa: determinants, consequences and policy intervention.西非加纳的劳动力区域间迁移:决定因素、后果及政策干预
Rev Black Polit Econ. 1991 Fall;20(2):89-103. doi: 10.1007/BF02689928.
8
Population pressure, intensification of agriculture, and rural-urban migration.人口压力、农业集约化和城乡迁移。
J Dev Econ. 1993 Apr;40:371-84. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(93)90091-z.
9
National monuments and economic growth in the American West.美国西部的国家纪念物与经济增长
Sci Adv. 2020 Mar 18;6(12):eaay8523. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay8523. eCollection 2020 Mar.
10
[Migrations and rural capitalization in Egypt: changes in the peasant family].[埃及的人口迁移与农村资本化:农民家庭的变化]
Tiers Monde (1960). 1985 Jul-Sep;26(103):523-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Time to Mainstream the Environment into Migration Theory?是时候将环境纳入移民理论的主流了吗?
Int Migr Rev. 2023 Mar;57(1):5-35. doi: 10.1177/01979183221074343. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Representation of ecological systems within the protected areas network of the Continental United States.美国大陆保护区网络内的生态系统表现。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054689. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
2
Household migration: theoretical and empirical results.家庭迁移:理论与实证结果
J Urban Econ. 1979;6(3):383-404. doi: 10.1016/0094-1190(79)90038-x.
3
The determinants of county growth.县域增长的决定因素。
J Reg Sci. 1987 Feb;27(1):39-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1987.tb01143.x.