Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ann Neurol. 2020 Aug;88(2):264-273. doi: 10.1002/ana.25757. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
Genome sequencing (GS) is promising for unsolved leukodystrophies, but its efficacy has not been prospectively studied.
A prospective time-delayed crossover design trial of GS to assess the efficacy of GS as a first-line diagnostic tool for genetic white matter disorders took place between December 1, 2015 and September 27, 2017. Patients were randomized to receive GS immediately with concurrent standard of care (SoC) testing, or to receive SoC testing for 4 months followed by GS.
Thirty-four individuals were assessed at interim review. The genetic origin of 2 patient's leukoencephalopathy was resolved before randomization. Nine patients were stratified to the immediate intervention group and 23 patients to the delayed-GS arm. The efficacy of GS was significant relative to SoC in the immediate (5/9 [56%] vs 0/9 [0%]; Wild-Seber, p < 0.005) and delayed (control) arms (14/23 [61%] vs 5/23 [22%]; Wild-Seber, p < 0.005). The time to diagnosis was significantly shorter in the immediate-GS group (log-rank test, p = 0.04). The overall diagnostic efficacy of combined GS and SoC approaches was 26 of 34 (76.5%, 95% confidence interval = 58.8-89.3%) in <4 months, greater than historical norms of <50% over 5 years. Owing to loss of clinical equipoise, the trial design was altered to a single-arm observational study.
In this study, first-line GS provided earlier and greater diagnostic efficacy in white matter disorders. We provide an evidence-based diagnostic testing algorithm to enable appropriate clinical GS utilization in this population. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:264-273.
基因组测序(GS)有望解决未明的白质脑病,但尚未前瞻性研究其疗效。
2015 年 12 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 27 日,进行了一项前瞻性延迟交叉设计试验,以评估 GS 作为遗传白质疾病一线诊断工具的疗效。患者被随机分为立即接受 GS 联合标准治疗(SoC)检测组,或先接受 4 个月 SoC 检测后再接受 GS 组。
34 名患者进行了中期评估。2 名患者的脑白质病变的遗传起源在随机分组前已明确。9 名患者被分到立即干预组,23 名患者分到延迟 GS 组。与 SoC 相比,GS 在立即干预组(5/9 [56%] vs 0/9 [0%];Wild-Seber,p < 0.005)和延迟 GS 组(14/23 [61%] vs 5/23 [22%];Wild-Seber,p < 0.005)中均有显著疗效。立即 GS 组的诊断时间明显缩短(对数秩检验,p = 0.04)。在 4 个月内,GS 联合 SoC 方法的总体诊断效能为 34 例中的 26 例(76.5%,95%置信区间为 58.8%-89.3%),优于 5 年内 <50%的历史标准。由于失去临床均衡,试验设计改为单臂观察性研究。
在本研究中,一线 GS 提供了更早和更高的白质疾病诊断效果。我们提供了一个基于证据的诊断检测算法,以支持在该人群中适当的临床 GS 应用。