Barra Fabio, Biscaldi Ennio, Scala Carolina, Laganà Antonio Simone, Vellone Valerio Gaetano, Stabilini Cesare, Ghezzi Fabio, Ferrero Simone
Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Apr 24;10(4):252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10040252.
(1) Objectives: In patients with symptoms suggestive of rectosigmoid endometriosis, imaging techniques are required to confirm the presence and establish the extent of the disease. The objective of the current study was to compare the performance of three-dimensional rectal water contrast transvaginal ultrasonography (3D-RWC-TVS) and computed tomographic colonography (CTC) in predicting the presence and characteristics of rectosigmoid endometriosis. (2) Methods: This prospective study included patients with suspicion of rectosigmoid endometriosis who underwent both 3D-RWC-TVS and CTC and subsequently were surgically treated. The findings of imaging techniques were compared with surgical and histological results. (3) Results: Out of 68 women included in the study, 37 (48.9; 95% C.I. 38.2-59.7%) had rectosigmoid nodules and underwent bowel surgery. There was no significant difference in the accuracy of 3D-RWC-TVS and CTC in diagnosing the presence of rectosigmoid endometriotic nodules ( = 0.118), although CTC was more precise in diagnosing endometriosis located in the sigmoid ( = 0.016). 3D-RWC-TVS and CTC had similar precision in estimating the largest diameter of the main endometriotic nodule ( = 0.099) and, in patients undergoing segmental resection, the degree of the stenosis of the bowel lumen ( = 0.293). CTC was more accurate in estimating the distance between the lower margin of the intestinal nodule and the anal verge ( = 0.030) but was less tolerated than 3D-RWC-TVS ( < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: This was the first study comparing the performance of 3D-RWC-TVS and CTC in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Both techniques allowed for the evaluation of the profile of the bowel lumen in a pseudoendoscopic fashion and had a similar performance for the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis, although CTC was more accurate in diagnosing and characterizing sigmoid nodules.
(1)目的:对于有直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症疑似症状的患者,需要借助成像技术来确认疾病的存在并确定其范围。本研究的目的是比较三维直肠水造影经阴道超声检查(3D-RWC-TVS)和计算机断层结肠成像(CTC)在预测直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的存在及特征方面的表现。(2)方法:这项前瞻性研究纳入了疑似直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症的患者,这些患者均接受了3D-RWC-TVS和CTC检查,随后接受了手术治疗。将成像技术的检查结果与手术及组织学结果进行比较。(3)结果:在纳入研究的68名女性中,37名(48.9%;95%置信区间38.2 - 59.7%)有直肠乙状结肠结节并接受了肠道手术。3D-RWC-TVS和CTC在诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位结节的存在方面准确性无显著差异(P = 0.118),尽管CTC在诊断位于乙状结肠的子宫内膜异位症方面更精确(P = 0.016)。3D-RWC-TVS和CTC在估计主要子宫内膜异位结节的最大直径方面(P = 0.099)以及在接受节段性切除的患者中估计肠腔狭窄程度方面(P = 0.293)具有相似的精度。CTC在估计肠结节下缘与肛缘之间的距离方面更准确(P = 0.030),但耐受性不如3D-RWC-TVS(P < 0.001)。(4)结论:这是第一项比较3D-RWC-TVS和CTC在诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症方面表现的研究。两种技术都能够以类似伪内镜的方式评估肠腔轮廓,并且在诊断直肠乙状结肠子宫内膜异位症方面表现相似,尽管CTC在诊断和表征乙状结肠结节方面更准确。