Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Oftalmología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, RETICS, Madrid, España.
Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Oftalmología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, RETICS, Madrid, España.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed). 2020 Jul;95(7):345-352. doi: 10.1016/j.oftal.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
Current management of glaucoma generally involves medical, laser, or surgical treatment in order to achieve an intraocular pressure (IOP) control which is commensurate with either stability or delayed progression of the disease. Although the follow-up of glaucoma patients is usually carried out with sporadic and isolated intraocular pressure measurements, the literature already indicates that this might not the best option to manage glaucoma patients. This article reviews the importance of 24hours intraocular pressure monitoring based on studies and publications that exist in this regard to date. A critical review on the methodology of these publications has been conducted. The need is stressed for further studies on the intraocular pressure patterns in different types of glaucoma, as well as the pattern with different therapies used in glaucoma aimed at optimising the management of the disease.
目前,青光眼的治疗通常包括药物、激光或手术治疗,以达到与疾病稳定或进展延缓相适应的眼内压(IOP)控制。尽管青光眼患者的随访通常是通过间歇性和孤立的眼压测量来进行,但文献已经表明,这可能不是管理青光眼患者的最佳选择。本文回顾了基于现有研究和出版物的 24 小时眼压监测的重要性。对这些出版物的方法学进行了批判性的回顾。强调需要进一步研究不同类型青光眼的眼压模式,以及不同类型的青光眼治疗方法的眼压模式,以优化疾病的管理。