Takeuchi Shinsuke, Yamaguchi Yoshihiro, Soejima Kyoko, Yoshino Hideaki
Department of Cardiology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Department of Trauma and Critical Care Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Japan.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(3_suppl):S48-S57. doi: 10.1177/2048872620923647. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
The exact epidemiology of acute aortic dissection, including cases of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, is unclear. We aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of acute aortic dissection in patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest transferred to our institution and validate the related factors to out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.
We retrospectively reviewed the acute-phase computed tomography data of patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest who visited our hospital between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017.
Among 1011 consecutive patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, excluding those aged 17 years and younger and exogenous out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, such as suicide and trauma, 934 underwent computed tomography examination and 71 (7.6%) were diagnosed with acute aortic dissection: 66 with Stanford type A and five with type B acute aortic dissection (out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest group). Seventy-five patients without out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection visited our institution during the same period (non-out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest group). Age, incidence of massive bloody pericardial effusion and massive intrathoracic haemorrhage were significantly higher in the out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest than in the non-out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest group (78 ± 8 years, 72.7% and 24.2% vs. 70 ± 13 years, 26.7% and 1.3%, respectively; all < 0.01). These variables were independently related to out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest.
There may be more patients with acute aortic dissection with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest than previously thought. Aortic rupture into the pericardial space or thoracic cavity is the major cause of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in these cases. Non-contrast computed tomography can be used to diagnose acute aortic dissection in patients with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Our study is one of a few to evaluate the real circumstances surrounding acute aortic dissection and its epidemiology.
急性主动脉夹层的确切流行病学情况,包括院外心肺骤停病例,尚不清楚。我们旨在调查转至我院的院外心肺骤停患者中急性主动脉夹层的发病率和特征,并验证斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层中院外心肺骤停的相关因素。
我们回顾性分析了2015年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间来我院就诊的院外心肺骤停患者的急性期计算机断层扫描数据。
在1011例连续的院外心肺骤停患者中,排除17岁及以下患者以及自杀和创伤等外源性院外心肺骤停病例后,934例接受了计算机断层扫描检查,71例(7.6%)被诊断为急性主动脉夹层:66例为斯坦福A型,5例为B型急性主动脉夹层(院外心肺骤停组)。同期有75例无院外心肺骤停的斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层患者来我院就诊(非院外心肺骤停组)。院外心肺骤停组的年龄、大量血性心包积液和大量胸腔内出血的发生率显著高于非院外心肺骤停组(分别为78±8岁、72.7%和24.2%,对比70±13岁、26.7%和1.3%;均P<0.01)。这些变量与院外心肺骤停独立相关。
院外心肺骤停的急性主动脉夹层患者可能比之前认为的更多。主动脉破裂进入心包腔或胸腔是这些病例院外心肺骤停的主要原因。非增强计算机断层扫描可用于诊断院外心肺骤停患者的急性主动脉夹层。我们的研究是少数评估急性主动脉夹层实际情况及其流行病学的研究之一。