• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增强结直肠息肉和腺瘤检测的患者教育:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Enhanced Patient Education for Colonic Polyp and Adenoma Detection: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 1;8(6):e17372. doi: 10.2196/17372.

DOI:10.2196/17372
PMID:32347798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7296415/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To improve patients' comprehension of bowel preparation instructions before colonoscopy, enhanced patient education (EPE) such as cartoon pictures or other visual aids, phone calls, mobile apps, multimedia education and social media apps have been proposed. However, it is uncertain whether EPE can increase the detection rate of colonic polyps and adenomas.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EPE in detecting colonic polyps and adenomas.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inception to June 2019 for the identification of trials comparing the EPE with standard patient education for outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. We used a random effects model to calculate summary estimates of the polyp detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one polyp divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), adenoma detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one adenoma divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), advanced adenoma detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one advanced adenoma divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one sessile serrated adenoma divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), cancer detection rate (defined as the number of patients with at least one cancer divided by the total number of patients undergoing selective colonoscopy), or adenoma detection rate - plus (defined as the number of additional adenomas found after the first adenoma per colonoscopy). Moreover, we conducted trial sequential analysis (TSA) to determine the robustness of summary estimates of all primary outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 10 randomized controlled trials enrolling 4560 participants for analysis. The meta-analysis suggested that EPE was associated with an increased polyp detection rate (9 trials; 3781 participants; risk ratio [RR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.35; P<.05; I=42%) and adenoma detection rate (5 trials; 2133 participants; RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.64; P<.001; I2=0%), which were established by TSA. Pooled result from the inverse-variance model illustrated an increase in the sessile serrated adenoma detection rate (3 trials; 1248 participants; odds ratio 1.76, 95% CI 1.22-2.53; P<.05; I=0%). One trial suggested an increase in the adenoma detection rate - plus (RR 4.39, 95% CI 2.91-6.61; P<.001). Pooled estimates from 3 (1649 participants) and 2 trials (1375 participants) generated no evidence of statistical difference for the advanced adenoma detection rate and cancer detection rate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence indicates that EPE should be recommended to instruct bowel preparation in patients undergoing colonoscopy because it can increase the polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and sessile serrated adenoma detection rate. However, further trials are warranted to determine the efficacy of EPE for advanced adenoma detection rate, adenoma detection rate - plus, and cancer detection rate because of limited data.

摘要

背景

为了提高患者对结肠镜检查前肠道准备的理解,增强患者教育(EPE),如使用卡通图片或其他视觉辅助工具、电话、移动应用程序、多媒体教育和社交媒体应用程序等方法已被提出。然而,EPE 是否能提高结肠息肉和腺瘤的检出率尚不确定。

目的

本荟萃分析旨在评估 EPE 对检测结肠息肉和腺瘤的疗效。

方法

我们从 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心数据库建库至 2019 年 6 月检索比较 EPE 与标准患者教育用于接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者的试验。我们使用随机效应模型计算息肉检出率(定义为至少检出一个息肉的患者人数除以选择性结肠镜检查的总人数)、腺瘤检出率(定义为至少检出一个腺瘤的患者人数除以选择性结肠镜检查的总人数)、高级腺瘤检出率(定义为至少检出一个高级腺瘤的患者人数除以选择性结肠镜检查的总人数)、锯齿状息肉检出率(定义为至少检出一个锯齿状息肉的患者人数除以选择性结肠镜检查的总人数)、癌症检出率(定义为至少检出一个癌症的患者人数除以选择性结肠镜检查的总人数)或腺瘤检出率加量(定义为每例结肠镜检查检出的额外腺瘤数)的综合估计值。此外,我们进行了试验序贯分析(TSA),以确定所有主要结局综合估计值的稳健性。

结果

我们纳入了 10 项随机对照试验,共 4560 名参与者。荟萃分析表明,EPE 与息肉检出率(9 项试验;3781 名参与者;风险比 [RR] 1.19,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.05-1.35;P<.05;I²=42%)和腺瘤检出率(5 项试验;2133 名参与者;RR 1.37,95% CI 1.15-1.64;P<.001;I²=0%)的增加有关,这些结果均由 TSA 确定。逆方差模型的汇总结果显示,锯齿状息肉的检出率增加(3 项试验;1248 名参与者;比值比 1.76,95% CI 1.22-2.53;P<.05;I²=0%)。一项试验表明,腺瘤检出率加量(RR 4.39,95% CI 2.91-6.61;P<.001)增加。3 项(1649 名参与者)和 2 项试验(1375 名参与者)的汇总估计值均未显示高级腺瘤检出率和癌症检出率有统计学差异。

结论

目前的证据表明,EPE 应该被推荐用于指导接受结肠镜检查的患者进行肠道准备,因为它可以提高息肉检出率、腺瘤检出率和锯齿状息肉检出率。然而,由于数据有限,还需要进一步的试验来确定 EPE 对高级腺瘤检出率、腺瘤检出率加量和癌症检出率的疗效。

相似文献

1
Enhanced Patient Education for Colonic Polyp and Adenoma Detection: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.增强结直肠息肉和腺瘤检测的患者教育:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 1;8(6):e17372. doi: 10.2196/17372.
2
The Efficacy of Split-Dose Bowel Preparations for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.分剂量肠道准备在息肉检测中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun;114(6):884-892. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000155.
3
Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状息肉的检出率:因患者性别和结肠节段而异,但与内镜医师的专业无关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1113-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000183.
4
Impact of EndoRings on colon adenoma detection rate: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.EndoRings 对结肠腺瘤检出率的影响:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;36(2):337-343. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15321. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
5
Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Endocuff 辅助与标准结肠镜检查提高腺瘤检出率的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Feb;27(2):91-101. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02642-9. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp detection rate of water exchange, Endocuff, and cap colonoscopy: A network meta-analysis.水交换、Endocuff 和帽式结肠镜对无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的检出率:一项网状荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3268-3277. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15702. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
7
Risk of Metachronous Polyps in Individuals With Serrated Polyps.锯齿状息肉患者发生异时性息肉的风险。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Aug;58(8):762-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000406.
8
Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.腺瘤和近端无蒂锯齿状息肉检出率与内镜医师特征的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):627-635. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564.
9
Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能在结直肠腺瘤和息肉检测中性能的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
10
Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.窄带成像与传统白光结肠镜检查在结直肠息肉检测中的应用比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008361. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008361.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a novel scoring system based on a nomogram for predicting inadequate bowel preparation.基于列线图的预测不充分肠道准备新型评分系统的建立与验证。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Sep;26(9):2262-2273. doi: 10.1007/s12094-024-03443-2. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Telephone instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.电话指导可提高结肠镜检查的肠道准备质量:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0289063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289063. eCollection 2023.
3
Enhancing bowel preparation quality and tolerability in a low health literacy population in Western China: a multicenter randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvement in colonoscopy quality metrics in clinical practice from 2000 to 2014.2000 年至 2014 年临床实践中结肠镜检查质量指标的改善。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Oct;90(4):651-655.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
2
Strategies to Improve Inpatients' Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.提高结肠镜检查住院患者肠道准备质量的策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 May 2;2019:5147208. doi: 10.1155/2019/5147208. eCollection 2019.
3
Low-Volume Polyethylene Glycol Improved Patient Attendance in Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis.
提高中国西部低健康素养人群的肠道准备质量和耐受性:一项多中心随机试验。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):17957-17971. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05493-5. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems.开发一种计算机定制干预措施/决策辅助工具以提高卫生系统中的结直肠癌筛查率
Cureus. 2022 Mar 21;14(3):e23372. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23372. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Reinforced education by short message service improves the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.短信强化教育可提高结肠镜检查肠道准备质量。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Apr;37(4):815-822. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04114-w. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Development of artificial intelligence technology in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of colorectal cancer.人工智能技术在结直肠癌诊断、治疗及预后方面的发展
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Jan 15;14(1):124-152. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i1.124.
7
Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查用肠道清洁剂的新领域。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 7;27(45):7748-7770. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7748.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials.增强版患者肠道准备指导在结肠镜检查前的应用效果比较:23 项随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 25;23(10):e19915. doi: 10.2196/19915.
9
Patient Engagement With Urologists on Social Media in a Community Practice.社区诊所中患者在社交媒体上与泌尿科医生的互动
Cureus. 2021 Sep 16;13(9):e18029. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18029. eCollection 2021 Sep.
10
Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.超低容量(≤1 升)肠道准备液的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Jan;34(1):13-32. doi: 10.1111/den.14015. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
小剂量聚乙二醇改善结肠镜检查前肠道准备的患者依从性:一项采用序贯试验分析的荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 May 6;6:92. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00092. eCollection 2019.
4
The Efficacy of Split-Dose Bowel Preparations for Polyp Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.分剂量肠道准备在息肉检测中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jun;114(6):884-892. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000155.
5
Use of smartphone applications to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用智能手机应用程序改善结肠镜检查肠道准备质量:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Feb;7(2):E216-E224. doi: 10.1055/a-0796-6423. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
6
Effect of WeChat and short message service on bowel preparation: an endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial.微信和短信服务对肠道准备的影响:一项内镜医师盲法随机对照试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;31(2):170-177. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001303.
7
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II).强化短信服务的患者教育以提高结肠镜检查准备质量和接受度:一项随机、多中心研究(PERICLES-II)的结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):506-513.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review.评估研究和研究综合报告偏倚风险的工具:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019703.
10
The Impact of Patient Education with a Smartphone Application on the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Screening Colonoscopy.使用智能手机应用程序进行患者教育对结肠镜筛查肠道准备质量的影响。
Clin Endosc. 2017 Sep;50(5):479-485. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.025. Epub 2017 Jul 3.