J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;50(7):388-396. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9400. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
To evaluate the effect of education interventions compared with any type of comparator on managing patellofemoral pain (PFP).
Intervention systematic review. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018088671.
MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for studies evaluating the effect of education on clinical and functional outcomes in people with PFP.
Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion and quality. We included randomized controlled trials on PFP where at least 1 group received an education intervention (in isolation or in combination with other interventions).
Available data were synthesized via meta-analysis where possible; data that were not appropriate for pooling were synthesized qualitatively. Interpretation was guided by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Nine trials were identified. Low-credibility evidence indicated that health education material alone was inferior to exercise therapy for pain and function outcomes. Low- and very low-credibility evidence indicated that health professional-delivered education alone produced outcomes similar to those of exercise therapy combined with health professional-delivered education for pain and function, respectively.
Health professional-delivered education may produce similar outcomes in pain and function compared to exercise therapy plus health professional-delivered education in people with PFP. .
评估教育干预措施与任何类型的对照相比，对髌股疼痛（PFP）管理的效果。
干预系统评价。PROSPERO 标识符：CRD42018088671。
检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science，以评估评估教育对 PFP 患者临床和功能结局影响的研究。
两名审查员独立评估纳入和质量的研究。我们纳入了至少有 1 组接受教育干预（单独或与其他干预措施结合）的 PFP 随机对照试验。
尽可能通过 meta 分析综合现有数据；不适合汇总的数据进行定性综合。解释由推荐评估、制定和评估方法指导。
确定了 9 项试验。低可信度证据表明，单独的健康教育材料在疼痛和功能结果方面劣于运动疗法。低可信度和极低可信度证据表明，单独提供的健康专业人员教育在疼痛和功能方面的结果与运动疗法加健康专业人员教育的结果相似。
与运动疗法加健康专业人员教育相比，健康专业人员提供的教育可能在 PFP 患者的疼痛和功能方面产生相似的结果。
