Gebreslassie Mihretab, Sampaio Filipa, Nystrand Camilla, Ssegonja Richard, Feldman Inna
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.
Prev Med. 2020 Jul;136:106100. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106100. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
Physical inactivity and unhealthy dietary habits are associated with an increased disease and economic burden. The aim of this systematic review was to identify economic evaluations of public health interventions targeting physical activity and healthy diet, and assess the quality and transferability of the findings to the Swedish context. A search of published economic evaluations was conducted through electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Databases (NHS EED) and the Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA). An additional search was done using references of relevant systematic reviews and websites of relevant organizations were checked to find grey literature. Quality and transferability of the economic evaluations were appraised using a quality assessment tool developed by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment. Thirty-two economic evaluations, rated as moderate or high quality, of 178 interventions were included; thirteen studies targeting physical activity, thirteen targeting healthy diet and six targeting both. The interventions varied in terms of their content, setting, mode of delivery and target populations. A majority of the economic evaluations reported that the interventions were likely to be cost-effective; however, considerable variations in the methodological and reporting qualities were observed. Only half of the economic evaluations were rated to have a high probability of transferring to the Swedish context. Public health interventions targeting physical activity and dietary habits have a high potential to be cost-effective. However, decision makers should consider the variation in quality and transferability of the available evidence.
缺乏身体活动和不健康的饮食习惯与疾病负担和经济负担的增加相关。本系统评价的目的是识别针对身体活动和健康饮食的公共卫生干预措施的经济评估,并评估研究结果对瑞典情况的质量和可转移性。通过包括PubMed、科学网、PsycINFO、国家卫生服务经济评估数据库(NHS EED)和卫生技术评估数据库(HTA)在内的电子数据库,对已发表的经济评估进行了检索。还利用相关系统评价的参考文献进行了额外检索,并检查了相关组织的网站以查找灰色文献。使用瑞典卫生技术评估局开发的质量评估工具,对经济评估的质量和可转移性进行了评估。纳入了对178项干预措施的32项质量评为中等或高质量的经济评估;13项针对身体活动,13项针对健康饮食,6项针对两者。这些干预措施在内容、环境、实施方式和目标人群方面各不相同。大多数经济评估报告称,这些干预措施可能具有成本效益;然而,在方法和报告质量方面观察到了相当大的差异。只有一半的经济评估被评为很有可能转移到瑞典情况。针对身体活动和饮食习惯的公共卫生干预措施具有很高的成本效益潜力。然而,决策者应考虑现有证据在质量和可转移性方面的差异。