Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Vectors & Vector-borne Diseases Research Programme, Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Apr 30;13(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04075-5.
Wild carnivores living alongside humans and domestic animals are vulnerable to changes in the infectious disease dynamics in their populations. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and diversity of selected tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) of veterinary and/or zoonotic concern in wild populations of caracals (Caracal caracal) occurring in human-modified landscapes in South Africa. Using molecular techniques, we screened 57 caracal blood samples for infection by rickettsial bacteria and piroplasms in three regions of South Africa: rangeland in the Central Karoo (n = 27) and Namaqualand (n = 14) as well as the urban edge of the Cape Peninsula (n = 16) of South Africa. To characterise pathogen identity, we sequenced the 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes from positive samples and analysed sequences within a phylogenetic framework. We also examine the diversity of potential tick vectors.
All individuals tested were infected with at least one tick-borne pathogen. Pathogens included Hepatozoon felis, Babesia felis, Babesia leo and a potentially novel Babesia species. An Anaplasma species previously described in South African domestic dogs was also found in 88% of urban edge caracals. Higher rates of co-infection characterised urban edge caracals (81% vs 15% and 0% in the two rangeland populations), as well as a greater incidence of mixed infections. Host attached tick species include Haemaphysalis elliptica, an important pathogen vector among carnivore hosts.
This study confirms the occurrence of previously undocumented tick-borne pathogens infecting free-ranging caracals in human-modified landscapes. We identify clear differences in the pathogen profiles among our study populations and discuss the likely health costs to caracals living adjacent to urban areas.
与人类和家畜共同生活的野生动物容易受到其种群中传染病动态变化的影响。本研究的目的是确定在南非人为改变的景观中,野生卡拉卡尔(Caracal caracal)种群中,兽医和/或人畜共患关注的选定蜱传病原体(TBPs)的流行率和多样性。使用分子技术,我们在南非的三个地区筛选了 57 份卡拉卡尔血液样本,以检测立克次体细菌和巴贝虫的感染情况:中央卡鲁(n = 27)和纳马夸兰(n = 14)的牧场以及南非开普半岛的城市边缘(n = 16)。为了确定病原体的身份,我们从阳性样本中测序了 18S rRNA 和 16S rRNA 基因,并在系统发育框架内分析了序列。我们还检查了潜在的蜱传播媒介的多样性。
所有受检个体均至少感染了一种蜱传病原体。病原体包括 Hepatozoon felis、Babesia felis、Babesia leo 和一种可能的新型 Babesia 物种。一种以前在南非家养犬中描述的 Anaplasma 物种也在 88%的城市边缘卡拉卡尔中被发现。城市边缘卡拉卡尔的合并感染率更高(81%比两个牧场种群的 15%和 0%),以及混合感染的发生率更高。附着在宿主上的蜱种包括 Haemaphysalis elliptica,这是肉食动物宿主中一种重要的病原体传播媒介。
本研究证实了以前在人为改变的景观中自由生活的卡拉卡尔感染未知的蜱传病原体的情况。我们确定了我们研究群体中病原体谱的明显差异,并讨论了生活在城市附近的卡拉卡尔可能面临的健康成本。