• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外部和内部资源如何影响用户行为:输液设备的案例

How external and internal resources influence user action: the case of infusion devices.

作者信息

Iacovides Ioanna, Blandford Ann, Cox Anna, Back Jonathan

机构信息

1Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK76AA UK.

2UCL Interaction Centre, University College London, 62-77 Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK.

出版信息

Cogn Technol Work. 2016;18(4):793-805. doi: 10.1007/s10111-016-0392-0. Epub 2016 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1007/s10111-016-0392-0
PMID:32355464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7175659/
Abstract

Human error can have potentially devastating consequences in contexts such as healthcare, but there is a rarely a simple dichotomy between errors and correct behaviour. Furthermore, there has been little consideration of how the activities of users (erroneous and otherwise) relate to the conceptual fit between user and device, despite the fact that healthcare technologies are becoming increasingly prevalent and complex. In this article, we present a study in which nurses' conceptions of infusion device practice were elicited to identify misfits. By focusing on key concepts that users work with when setting up infusions and the extent to which the system supports them, our analysis highlights how actions are influenced by the different resources available to users including: the device itself; supporting artefacts; the conceptual understanding of the user; and the community of practice the user is part of. The findings reveal the ways in which users are resourceful in their day-to-day activities and also suggest potential vulnerabilities within the wider system that could threaten patient safety. Our approach is able to make previously under-explored aspects of practice visible, thus enabling insight into how users act and why.

摘要

在医疗保健等领域,人为错误可能会带来潜在的灾难性后果,但错误与正确行为之间很少存在简单的二分法。此外,尽管医疗技术越来越普及和复杂,但很少有人考虑用户的活动(无论是否错误)与用户和设备之间的概念契合度是如何关联的。在本文中,我们展示了一项研究,该研究引出了护士对输液设备操作的概念,以识别不匹配之处。通过关注用户在设置输液时所使用的关键概念以及系统对他们的支持程度,我们的分析突出了行动是如何受到用户可利用的不同资源影响的,这些资源包括:设备本身;辅助工具;用户的概念理解;以及用户所属的实践社区。研究结果揭示了用户在日常活动中足智多谋的方式,也表明了更广泛系统中可能威胁患者安全的潜在漏洞。我们的方法能够使之前未被充分探索的实践方面显现出来,从而有助于深入了解用户的行为方式及其原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a078/7175659/e243184a5eae/10111_2016_392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a078/7175659/6e9b35318e7e/10111_2016_392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a078/7175659/e243184a5eae/10111_2016_392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a078/7175659/6e9b35318e7e/10111_2016_392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a078/7175659/e243184a5eae/10111_2016_392_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
How external and internal resources influence user action: the case of infusion devices.外部和内部资源如何影响用户行为:输液设备的案例
Cogn Technol Work. 2016;18(4):793-805. doi: 10.1007/s10111-016-0392-0. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
2
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
3
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Experiences of user involvement in mental health settings: User motivations and benefits.服务使用者参与心理健康服务的经历:使用者的动机与益处。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;25(5-6):327-337. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12466. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
7
User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.用户参与医疗技术开发与评估:结构化文献综述
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2006;19(6-7):500-15. doi: 10.1108/09526860610687619.
8
Advance healthcare directives in mental health: A qualitative analysis from a Spanish healthcare professional's viewpoint.精神健康中的预先医疗指示:来自西班牙医疗保健专业人员视角的定性分析。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;26(7-8):223-232. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12539. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Current Landscape of Intravenous Infusion Practices and Errors (ECLIPSE): protocol for a mixed-methods observational study.探索静脉输液实践与差错的现状(ECLIPSE):一项混合方法观察性研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 3;6(3):e009777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009777.
2
Patient safety and interactive medical devices: Realigning work as imagined and work as done.患者安全与交互式医疗设备:使设想中的工作与实际开展的工作重新契合。
Clin Risk. 2014 Sep;20(5):107-110. doi: 10.1177/1356262214556550.
3
Infusion device standardisation and dose error reduction software.
输液设备标准化及剂量误差减少软件
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(14):S16, S18, S20 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.sup14.s16.
4
Designing devices with the task in mind: which numbers are really used in hospitals?设计时心中有数:医院实际使用哪些数字?
Hum Factors. 2013 Feb;55(1):61-74. doi: 10.1177/0018720812471988.
5
Human factors-focused reporting system for improving care quality and safety in hospital wards.以人为因素为重点的报告系统,以提高医院病房的护理质量和安全性。
Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):195-213. doi: 10.1177/0018720811434767.
6
Cognitive performance-altering effects of electronic medical records: An application of the human factors paradigm for patient safety.电子病历对认知表现的改变作用:将人因范式应用于患者安全
Cogn Technol Work. 2011 Mar;13(1):11-29. doi: 10.1007/s10111-010-0141-8.
7
Between choice and chance: the role of human factors in acute care equipment decisions.在选择和机会之间:人为因素在急性护理设备决策中的作用。
J Patient Saf. 2009 Jun;5(2):114-21. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181a974d9.
8
Double checking medicines: defence against error or contributory factor?双重核对药品:是防范差错的手段还是促成因素?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Aug;14(4):513-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00907.x.
9
UK registered nurse medical device education: a comparison of hospital and bank nurses.英国注册护士医疗器械教育:医院护士和银行护士的比较。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2001 Jun;1(2):85-93. doi: 10.1054/nepr.2001.0015.
10
Cognitive mismatches in the cockpit: will they ever be a thing of the past?驾驶舱中的认知不匹配:它们会成为过去式吗?
Appl Ergon. 2007 Jul;38(4):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Apr 19.