• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在老年房颤患者中的有效性和安全性比较:一项系统评价和成本效益分析方案

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-k antagonists in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis protocol.

作者信息

Wang Na, Shen Nan-Nan, Wu Yue, Zhang Chi, Pan Mang-Mang, Qian Yan, Gu Zhi-Chun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200127, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):391. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.109.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2020.02.109
PMID:32355835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7186719/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the elderly with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains scarce. Based on the emerging evidence from real-world studies (RWSs) associated with DOACs, we will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from RWSs and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effectiveness, safety and cost of DOACs versus Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in elderly patients with AF.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases will be systematically searched until June 30, 2019 for eligible RWSs and RCTs that reported the clinical outcomes between DOACs and VKAs in elderly patients with AF. The effectiveness outcome is stroke or systemic embolism (SE), and the safety outcomes are major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model will be used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for RWSs and relative risks (RRs) for RCTs, separately. The interaction analysis and the ratio of HRs (RHRs) will be applied to compare the treatment effect difference between RWSs and RCTs. A Markov model will be constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of DOACs versus VKAs in elderly AF patients in real-world setting.

DISCUSSION

This study will summarize all available evidences from RWSs and RCTs for a comprehensive and rigorous systematic review on the effectiveness and safety associated with DOACs, as well as perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the price performance of DOACs among elderly AF patients in real clinical setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO register platform (CRD42019142881, www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID =142881).

摘要

背景

关于直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在老年房颤(AF)患者中的有效性和安全性,目前的证据仍然很少。基于与DOACs相关的真实世界研究(RWSs)中不断涌现的证据,我们将对RWSs和随机对照试验(RCTs)的数据进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较DOACs与维生素K拮抗剂(VKAs)在老年AF患者中的有效性、安全性和成本。

方法

将系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,直至2019年6月30日,以查找报告DOACs与VKAs在老年AF患者中临床结局的合格RWSs和RCTs。有效性结局为卒中或全身性栓塞(SE),安全性结局为大出血、颅内出血(ICH)、胃肠道出血(GIB)、心肌梗死(MI)和全因死亡率。将分别使用随机效应模型计算RWSs的调整风险比(HRs)和RCTs的相对风险(RRs)。将应用交互分析和HRs比值(RHRs)来比较RWSs和RCTs之间的治疗效果差异。将构建一个马尔可夫模型来评估DOACs与VKAs在真实世界中对老年AF患者的成本效益。

讨论

本研究将总结RWSs和RCTs的所有可用证据,对与DOACs相关的有效性和安全性进行全面而严格的系统评价,并进行成本效益分析,以评估DOACs在实际临床环境中对老年AF患者的性价比。

试验注册

PROSPERO注册平台(CRD42019142881,www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID =142881)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-k antagonists in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis protocol.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在老年房颤患者中的有效性和安全性比较:一项系统评价和成本效益分析方案
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):391. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.109.
2
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Comparing Benefits and Harms Between Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.老年房颤患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较:一项系统评价,比较观察性研究和随机对照试验之间的获益与危害
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Sep 10;7:132. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00132. eCollection 2020.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1456-1478.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.358. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Vs. Vitamin K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From the Evidence in a Real-World Setting.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂用于老年房颤患者的成本效益分析:来自真实世界证据的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 29;8:675200. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.675200. eCollection 2021.
5
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin K Antagonists in Atrial Fibrillation Patients at Risk of Falling: A Meta-Analysis.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂用于有跌倒风险的房颤患者:一项荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 9;9:833329. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.833329. eCollection 2022.
6
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Warfarin in Latin American Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Evidence From Four Analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于拉丁美洲心房颤动患者的比较:来自四项随机临床试验分析的证据
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 4;9:841341. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.841341. eCollection 2022.
7
Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding: a network meta-analysis of real-world data.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于既往有胃肠道出血的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者:真实世界数据的网状Meta分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jul;78(7):1057-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03300-7. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
8
Number needed to treat based on real-world evidence for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.基于真实世界证据的非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药与维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝药用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中预防的治疗需要人数。
J Med Econ. 2019 Aug;22(8):760-765. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1606001. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
Safety and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation - a network meta-analysis of real-world data.直接作用口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在非瓣膜性心房颤动中的安全性和有效性——基于真实世界数据的网状荟萃分析
Vasa. 2019 Mar;48(2):134-147. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000746. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
10
Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis.口服抗凝药预防心房颤动患者卒中:系统评价、网状Meta分析及成本效益分析
BMJ. 2017 Nov 28;359:j5058. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5058.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and Disease Management in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation ≥80 Years: Data From a Consecutive 11-Year Real-World Registry.80岁及以上心房颤动患者的结局与疾病管理:来自连续11年真实世界注册研究的数据
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e036832. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036832. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
2
Patients on vitamin K treatment: is switching to direct-acting oral anticoagulation cost-effective? A target trial on a prospective cohort.正在接受维生素 K 治疗的患者:改用直接口服抗凝剂是否具有成本效益?一项针对前瞻性队列的目标试验。
Open Heart. 2024 Jan 31;11(1):e002567. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002567.
3
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Octogenarians with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Reduction in Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Pooled, 5-Year, Long-Term Data.左心耳封堵术降低房颤患者卒中风险的成本效果分析:汇总 5 年长期数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e011577. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011577. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
2
Risk of Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding With New vs Conventional Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型口服抗凝剂与传统口服抗凝剂相比的主要胃肠道出血风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Apr;18(4):792-799.e61. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.056. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Four Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
直接口服抗凝剂与华法林用于老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):5268. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225268.
4
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.80 岁及以上患者的直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094443.
四种直接口服抗凝剂在亚洲非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的有效性和安全性。
Chest. 2019 Sep;156(3):529-543. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.108. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for People Aged 75 Years and over with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂用于75岁及以上心房颤动患者的有效性和安全性:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 24;8(4):554. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040554.
5
Meta-Analysis of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Warfarin in Patients >75 Years of Age.直接口服抗凝剂与华法林在>75 岁患者中的比较的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 15;123(12):2051-2057. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.060. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
6
Comparison of All-Cause Mortality Following VTE Treatment Between Propensity Score-Adjusted Observational Studies and Matched Randomized Controlled Trials: Meta-Epidemiologic Study.基于倾向评分调整的观察性研究与匹配随机对照试验比较:系统评价。
Chest. 2019 Apr;155(4):689-698. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Comparison to Phenprocoumon in Geriatric and Non-Geriatric Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂与苯丙香豆素在老年和非老年非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中的比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jun;119(6):971-980. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683422. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
Healthcare Economics of Hydrocephalus After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the United States.美国蛛网膜下腔出血后脑积水的医疗经济学
Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Dec;10(6):650-663. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00697-9. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
Patients aged 90 years or older with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: A multicentre observational study.90 岁或以上接受口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者:一项多中心观察性研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Apr 15;281:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.071. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
10
Net Clinical Benefit of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist vs Vitamin K Antagonist Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.非维生素 K 拮抗剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂抗凝剂在老年房颤患者中的净临床获益。
Am J Med. 2019 Jun;132(6):749-757.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Jan 19.