• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

80 岁及以上患者的直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂。

Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.

机构信息

"Pôle Personnes Âgées", Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, 21079 Dijon, France.

INSERM U-1093, Cognition, Action and Sensorimotor Plasticity, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, 21000 Dijon, France.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094443.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18094443
PMID:33922331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8122810/
Abstract

The effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) to treat atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this cross-sectional study, we compared older persons taking DOACs to those taking VKAs. We included ambulatory individuals ≥80 years, affiliated to Mutualité Sociale Agricole of Burgundy, who were refunded for a medical prescription in September 2017. The demographic conditions, registered chronic diseases (RCD), and number and types of prescribed drugs were compared in the DOAC group and VKA group. Of the 3190 included individuals, 1279 (40%) were prescribed DOACs and 1911 (60%) VKAs. Individuals taking VKAs were older than those taking DOACs (87.11 vs. 86.35 years). In the DOAC group, there were more women (51.92% vs. 48.25%) ( = 0.043), less RCD (89.60% vs. 92.73%) ( = 0.002), less VTE (1.80% vs. 6.59%), less severe heart failure (58.09% vs. 67.87%), less severe hypertension (18.22% vs. 23.60%), less severe kidney diseases (1.49% vs. 3.82%), and fewer drugs per prescription (6.15 vs. 6.66) ( < 0.01 for all). The DOAC group were also less likely to be taking angiotensin receptor blockers (10.79% vs. 13.97%), furosemide (40.81% vs. 49.66%) or digoxin (10.32% vs. 13.66%) than the VKA group ( = 0.009, < 0.001, and = 0.005). DOACs were less prescribed than VKAs. Individuals taking VKAs were older and had more severe comorbidities and more drugs per prescription than those taking DOACs.

摘要

直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 在治疗房颤和静脉血栓栓塞症 (VTE) 方面的疗效不劣于维生素 K 拮抗剂 (VKA)。在这项横断面研究中,我们比较了服用 DOAC 和 VKA 的老年人。我们纳入了 2017 年 9 月在勃艮第 Mutualité Sociale Agricole 就诊且有医保报销的年龄≥80 岁的门诊患者。比较了 DOAC 组和 VKA 组的人口统计学条件、登记的慢性病 (RCD) 以及处方药物的数量和类型。在纳入的 3190 名患者中,1279 名 (40%)服用 DOAC,1911 名 (60%)服用 VKA。服用 VKA 的患者比服用 DOAC 的患者年龄更大 (87.11 岁比 86.35 岁)。在 DOAC 组中,女性更多 (51.92%比 48.25%) ( = 0.043),RCD 更少 (89.60%比 92.73%) ( = 0.002),VTE 更少 (1.80%比 6.59%),严重心力衰竭更少 (58.09%比 67.87%),严重高血压更少 (18.22%比 23.60%),严重肾脏疾病更少 (1.49%比 3.82%),且每张处方的药物更少 (6.15 比 6.66) (所有 P 值均<0.01)。DOAC 组服用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂 (10.79%比 13.97%)、呋塞米 (40.81%比 49.66%)或地高辛 (10.32%比 13.66%)的可能性也较小 ( = 0.009、<0.001 和 = 0.005)。与 VKA 相比,DOAC 的使用较少。服用 VKA 的患者年龄较大,合并症更严重,每张处方的药物更多。

相似文献

1
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older.80 岁及以上患者的直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094443.
2
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Individuals Aged 80 Years and Older: An Overview in 2021.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂在 80 岁及以上人群中的应用:2021 年概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021448.
3
Clinical Benefit of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂在合并生物瓣心脏瓣膜的心房颤动患者中的临床获益比较。
Clin Ther. 2019 Dec;41(12):2549-2557. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.10.008. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
The Prescription of Vitamin K Antagonists in a Very Old Population: A Cross-Sectional Study of 8696 Ambulatory Subjects Aged Over 85 Years.非常高龄人群中维生素 K 拮抗剂的处方:8696 名 85 岁以上门诊患者的横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;17(18):6685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186685.
5
Clinical profile of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K anticoagulants in octogenarians with atrial fibrillation: a multicentre propensity score matched real-world cohort study.八旬老年房颤患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂的临床特征:一项多中心倾向评分匹配真实世界队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):42-53. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01923-9.
6
Effectiveness and Safety of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动和静脉血栓栓塞的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Ther. 2017 Jul;39(7):1456-1478.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.358. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
7
The prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in the elderly: An observational study of 19 798 Ambulatory subjects.老年患者直接口服抗凝剂的处方:19798 例门诊患者的观察性研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Jan;74(1):e13420. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13420. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
8
Bleeding and thrombotic complications during treatment with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists in venous thromboembolic patients included in the prospective, observational START2-register.在静脉血栓栓塞患者中使用直接口服抗凝剂或维生素 K 拮抗剂治疗期间的出血和血栓并发症,包括在前瞻性、观察性 START2 注册研究中。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 27;10(11):e040449. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040449.
9
Major bleeding with vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants in real-life.维生素K拮抗剂或直接口服抗凝剂在实际应用中的大出血情况
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.117. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Case fatality of bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism during, initial therapy with direct oral anticoagulants: a systematic review.直接口服抗凝剂初始治疗期间出血和复发性静脉血栓栓塞的病死率:一项系统评价
Thromb Res. 2014 Sep;134(3):627-32. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiology of maxillofacial trauma in elderly patients receiving oral anticoagulant or antithrombotic medication; a Swiss retrospective study.接受口服抗凝药或抗血栓药物治疗的老年患者颌面部创伤的流行病学;一项瑞士的回顾性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 18;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01039-1.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.比较利伐沙班和达比加群在肝硬化急性门静脉血栓形成治疗中的疗效和安全性。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02960-8.
3
Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Individuals Aged 80 Years and Older: An Overview in 2021.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素 K 拮抗剂在 80 岁及以上人群中的应用:2021 年概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021448.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs. Vitamin-K Antagonists in the Elderly With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review Comparing Benefits and Harms Between Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.老年房颤患者中直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂的比较:一项系统评价,比较观察性研究和随机对照试验之间的获益与危害
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Sep 10;7:132. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00132. eCollection 2020.
2
2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC.2020年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的心房颤动诊断和管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)心房颤动诊断和管理特别工作组,由ESC欧洲心律协会(EHRA)特别贡献制定。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
3
[Direct oral anticoagulants: In which indications? Which one to prescribe? For or against their use in frail patients and in atypical cases? Which monitoring and management haemorrhage complications?].[直接口服抗凝剂:适用于哪些适应症?开哪种药?支持还是反对在体弱患者和非典型病例中使用?如何监测和处理出血并发症?]
Rev Med Interne. 2020 Sep;41(9):598-606. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.05.026. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
4
Long-Term Association of Venous Thromboembolism With Frailty, Physical Functioning, and Quality of Life: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.静脉血栓栓塞与虚弱、身体功能和生活质量的长期关联:社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 16;9(12):e015656. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015656. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
5
Comparison of effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-k antagonists in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis protocol.直接口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂在老年房颤患者中的有效性和安全性比较:一项系统评价和成本效益分析方案
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(6):391. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.109.
6
Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Liver Disease in the Era of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Global Epidemic: A Narrative Review.直接口服抗凝剂在非酒精性脂肪性肝病全球流行时代肝病患者中的应用:一项叙述性综述。
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):1910-1932. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01307-z. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
7
European Stroke Organisation Guideline on Reversal of Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Intracerebral Haemorrhage.欧洲卒中组织关于急性脑出血中口服抗凝剂逆转的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):294-306. doi: 10.1177/2396987319849763. Epub 2019 May 14.
8
Frailty in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者的衰弱
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2019 Dec;21(Suppl L):L12-L16. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz238. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂在肝硬化患者中的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
QJM. 2019 Aug 1;112(8):605-610. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz127.
10
Drug-drug interactions involving CYP3A4 and p-glycoprotein in hospitalized elderly patients.涉及住院老年患者中 CYP3A4 和 P-糖蛋白的药物-药物相互作用。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Jul;65:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 10.