Lancioni G E, van Dijk J, Driessen M, Manders N
University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1988 Dec;19(4):267-73. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(88)90056-0.
The present study was aimed at developing and assessing an automatic prompting instrument with three multihandicapped students who showed breaks in performance. The effects of the instrument were compared with the effects of manual prompting with simple tasks involving locomotion. The results indicated that manual and instrument prompting were both successful in reducing the amount of time spent in breaks. The effects of the instrument were replicated within subjects. The same effects were still visible during a follow-up assessment. The reliability and durability of those effects as well as the practical implications of automatic prompting are discussed.
本研究旨在为三名表现出现中断的多重残疾学生开发并评估一种自动提示工具。将该工具的效果与涉及移动的简单任务的手动提示效果进行了比较。结果表明，手动提示和工具提示在减少中断时间方面均取得了成功。该工具的效果在个体内部得到了重复验证。在后续评估中，同样的效果仍然可见。文中讨论了这些效果的可靠性和持久性以及自动提示的实际意义。
