• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing views on civil commitment for drug misuse and for mental illness among persons with opioid use disorder.比较阿片类物质使用障碍患者对因药物滥用和精神疾病进行民事强制住院治疗的看法。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jun;113:107998. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.107998. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Civil commitment experiences among opioid users.阿片类使用者的民事承诺经历。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Risk behaviors among persons civilly committed for opioid use.阿片类物质使用障碍患者的风险行为。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Jan;132:108493. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108493. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
Opioid relapse and MOUD outcomes following civil commitment for opioid use.民事收治后阿片类药物使用的阿片类药物复发和 MOUD 结局。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2022 Nov;142:108873. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108873. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Civil commitment for opioid misuse: do short-term benefits outweigh long-term harms?阿片类药物滥用的民事责任:短期效益是否超过长期危害?
J Med Ethics. 2022 Sep;48(9):608-610. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107160. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
Gender Differences in Civil Commitment Hearing Experience for Persons Who Use Opioids.性别差异在涉及阿片类药物使用者的民事拘留听证体验中。
J Addict Med. 2023;17(6):e355-e360. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001196. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
Civil commitment perspectives and experiences among friends and family of people who use illicit opioids in Massachusetts, USA.美国马萨诸塞州使用非法阿片类药物者的朋友和家人对民事收治的看法和经历。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jul;117:104074. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104074. Epub 2023 May 25.
8
Descriptive Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Cohorts Seeking Treatment After Prescription Opioid Misuse and Medical Toxicology Evaluation.描述性分析:在处方类阿片类药物滥用和医疗毒理学评估后寻求治疗的住院和门诊患者队列。
J Med Toxicol. 2021 Oct;17(4):378-385. doi: 10.1007/s13181-021-00850-7. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
Considerations in civil commitment of individuals with substance use disorders.对患有物质使用障碍的个体进行民事强制住院治疗的考量因素。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):181-7. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1029207. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Underfunding of Psychiatric Services for the Civilly and Criminally Committed.民事和刑事机构中精神科服务的资金不足。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2022 Dec;50(4):541-544. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.220063-22. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Views and experiences of involuntary civil commitment of people who use drugs in Massachusetts (Section 35).马萨诸塞州(第 35 节)非自愿民事拘留吸毒者的观点和经验。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2024 Oct 1;263:112391. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112391. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Criminalization of Opioid Civil Commitment.阿片类药物民事强制治疗的刑事定罪。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 1;77(2):111-112. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2845.
2
Civil commitment experiences among opioid users.阿片类使用者的民事承诺经历。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Dec 1;193:137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
The Role of Civil Commitment in the Opioid Crisis.《民事责任在阿片类药物危机中的作用》。
J Law Med Ethics. 2018 Jun;46(2):343-350. doi: 10.1177/1073110518782943.
4
Civil commitment laws for substance abuse treatment: An acceptable option?针对药物滥用治疗的民事强制收容法律:一种可接受的选择?
R I Med J (2013). 2018 Jun 1;101(5):11-12.
5
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub5.
6
Perceived coercion to enter treatment among involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients with substance use disorders.在非自愿和自愿入院的物质使用障碍患者中,对接受治疗的感知性强制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 15;16(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1906-4.
7
Nature and Utilization of Civil Commitment for Substance Abuse in the United States.美国药物滥用民事强制收治的本质与应用
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Sep;43(3):313-20.
8
European laws on compulsory commitment to care of persons suffering from substance use disorders or misuse problems- a comparative review from a human and civil rights perspective.欧洲关于强制收治物质使用障碍或滥用问题患者的法律——从人权和公民权利角度的比较性综述
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Aug 28;10:34. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0029-y.
9
Considerations in civil commitment of individuals with substance use disorders.对患有物质使用障碍的个体进行民事强制住院治疗的考量因素。
Subst Abus. 2016;37(1):181-7. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2015.1029207. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Civil commitment in the United States.美国的民事强制住院制度。
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2010 Oct;7(10):30-40.

比较阿片类物质使用障碍患者对因药物滥用和精神疾病进行民事强制住院治疗的看法。

Comparing views on civil commitment for drug misuse and for mental illness among persons with opioid use disorder.

作者信息

Christopher Paul P, Anderson Bradley, Stein Michael D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, United States of America.

General Medicine Unit, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jun;113:107998. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.107998. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2020.107998
PMID:32359671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7200755/
Abstract

Despite the growing use of civil commitment for drug use disorders, little is known about attitudes among individuals who might be subject to civil commitment. This study examined attitudes of persons with opioid use disorder toward civil commitment for drug misuse and for psychiatric illness. Consecutive persons entering a brief, inpatient opioid detoxification (n = 254) were surveyed regarding their attitudes about civil commitment for mental illness and for drug use, and responses were compared by commitment type and by individual history of being civilly committed for opioid misuse. Participants endorsed high support for civil commitment (both psychiatric and drug misuse-related) when used to address risk of harm to self, to others, and of criminal activity. Respondents were more likely to support civil commitment for psychiatric disorders than for drug misuse, expressing higher support for civil commitment in general, higher agreement with the criteria used to justify civil commitment, and greater perceived efficacy of commitment. Individuals previously committed for opioid misuse were less likely to support drug misuse-related commitment on the basis of its perceived efficacy. These results suggest individuals with opioid use disorder hold more favorable views toward civil commitment for mental health disorders than for drug misuse, and reinforce the need for more research on the procedures and outcomes related to civil commitment for drug misuse.

摘要

尽管因药物使用障碍而进行民事强制住院治疗的情况越来越普遍,但对于可能被实施民事强制住院治疗的个人的态度却知之甚少。本研究调查了患有阿片类药物使用障碍的人对因药物滥用和精神疾病而进行民事强制住院治疗的态度。对连续进入短期住院阿片类药物脱毒治疗的人员(n = 254)进行了调查,询问他们对因精神疾病和药物使用而进行民事强制住院治疗的态度,并按强制住院类型以及因阿片类药物滥用而被民事强制住院的个人病史对回答进行了比较。当用于解决对自己、他人的伤害风险以及犯罪活动风险时,参与者对民事强制住院治疗(包括与精神疾病和药物滥用相关的)表示高度支持。与药物滥用相比,受访者更倾向于支持针对精神疾病的民事强制住院治疗,总体上对民事强制住院治疗的支持度更高,对用于证明民事强制住院治疗合理性的标准的认同度更高,且认为强制住院治疗的效果更佳。曾因阿片类药物滥用而被强制住院的个人基于其感知到的效果,不太可能支持与药物滥用相关的强制住院治疗。这些结果表明,患有阿片类药物使用障碍的人对因精神健康障碍而进行的民事强制住院治疗的看法比对因药物滥用而进行的民事强制住院治疗更为积极,并强化了对与药物滥用相关的民事强制住院治疗的程序和结果进行更多研究的必要性。