Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Meyer B-121F, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-7093, USA.
Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Meyer B-121F, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-7093, USA.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jun;127:104384. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104384. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was first isolated from Wuhan city, China and within three months, the global community was challenged with a devastating pandemic. The rapid spread of the virus challenged diagnostic laboratories to rapidly develop molecular diagnostic methods. As SARS CoV-2 assays became available for testing on existing molecular platforms, laboratories devoted unprecedented energy and resources into evaluating the analytical performance of the new tests and in some cases developed their own diagnostic assays under FDA-EUA guidance. This study compares the validation of three different molecular assays at the Johns Hopkins Molecular Virology laboratory: the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, ePlex® SARS-CoV-2, and the CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR tests. Overall, our studies indicate a comparable analytical performance of the three assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.
2019 年 12 月,一种新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)首次从中国武汉市分离出来,在三个月内,全球社会面临着一场毁灭性的大流行。病毒的迅速传播给诊断实验室带来了挑战,需要迅速开发分子诊断方法。随着 SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒可在现有分子平台上进行检测,实验室投入了前所未有的精力和资源来评估新检测方法的分析性能,在某些情况下,还根据 FDA-EUA 指南开发了自己的诊断检测方法。本研究比较了约翰霍普金斯分子病毒学实验室的三种不同分子检测方法的验证:RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR、ePlex® SARS-CoV-2 和 CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR 检测。总体而言,我们的研究表明,这三种检测方法在检测 SARS-CoV-2 方面具有可比的分析性能。