Department of Biodiversity and Restoration, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC), Avda. Montañana 1005, Zaragoza, 50059, Spain; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, Cambridge, CB2 1RL, UK.
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK; Biosecurity Research Initiative at St Catharine's (BioRISC), St Catharine's College, Cambridge, CB2 1RL, UK.
Water Res. 2020 Jul 1;178:115771. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115771. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
The expansion of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) is a growing concern to the UK water industry because of their diverse impacts on water quality, infrastructure and eradication costs. New regulations reinforcing the industry's responsibilities beyond operational costs, coupled with continued range expansion and establishment of new IAS will increase damages. To tackle IAS effectively, the water industry requires reliable information about which species pose the greatest risk to operations and which areas are most vulnerable to invasion. Here we assess potential biosecurity threats for the 24 water companies in the UK using well-established modelling research techniques such as risk assessment and distribution modelling. Using a consensus approach with environmental managers and water companies, we identified 11 IAS of concern for the UK water industry, including five plants, three crustaceans, two molluscs and one fish. These invaders pose important hazards in terms of water quality, flood protection, human health, integrity of infrastructures, recreational and aesthetic values, amongst others. We used distribution models to predict their potential expansion under current and future 2050 climate scenarios within each of the 24 water companies in the UK. Water companies in the South East of England (Cambridge Water, Anglian Water, Affinity Water and Thames Water) are under the highest risk of invasional meltdown from multiple IAS, both now and under future scenarios. The quagga mussel poses the most serious risk of immediate spread and may exacerbate the impacts of the widespread zebra mussel for the water industry. The information generated in this study can support the prioritization of species and regions at risk, so that funds for prevention and eradication of invasions are well allocated. Ultimately, this study demonstrates that scientific risk assessments, usually restricted to the academic and public sectors, can be extremely useful to guide decision-making by the private sector.
入侵外来物种(IAS)的扩张对英国水行业来说是一个日益严重的问题,因为它们对水质、基础设施和根除成本有多种影响。新的法规加强了行业的责任,超出了运营成本,再加上持续的范围扩大和新的 IAS 的建立,将增加损害。为了有效地应对 IAS,水行业需要有关哪些物种对运营构成最大风险以及哪些地区最容易受到入侵的可靠信息。在这里,我们使用风险评估和分布建模等成熟的建模研究技术,评估英国 24 家水务公司的潜在生物安全威胁。我们采用与环境管理人员和水务公司的共识方法,确定了英国水行业关注的 11 种 IAS,包括 5 种植物、3 种甲壳类动物、2 种软体动物和 1 种鱼类。这些入侵物种在水质、防洪、人类健康、基础设施完整性、娱乐和审美价值等方面构成了重要的危害。我们使用分布模型来预测它们在当前和未来 2050 年气候情景下在英国 24 家水务公司中的潜在扩张。英格兰东南部的水务公司(剑桥水务、安格利亚水务、亲和力水务和泰晤士水务)面临来自多种 IAS 的入侵性崩溃的风险最高,无论是现在还是在未来的情景下。斑马贻贝构成了最严重的即时传播风险,可能会加剧水行业中广泛存在的斑马贻贝的影响。本研究产生的信息可以支持对风险物种和地区进行优先排序,以便将预防和根除入侵的资金进行合理分配。最终,本研究表明,科学风险评估通常仅限于学术和公共部门,可以非常有助于指导私营部门的决策。