• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与结直肠癌筛查计划的不平等现象:系统评价。

Inequalities in participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.

机构信息

Cirugía Computacional, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.

Department of Sociology 2, Social and Communication Sciences Faculty, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;30(3):416-425. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz236.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckz236
PMID:32361732
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem due to its incidence and mortality. Screening programmes help decrease its impact on the population through early detection. However, the uneven distribution of social determinants of health can cause inequalities. The aim of this study is to identify the social inequalities in the participation in CRC screening programmes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out, searching in both health and social databases for papers published since 2000 in English, Spanish, Portuguese and French. The search strategies combined terms regarding screening, CRC, participation and social inequalities. Included papers were quantitative or qualitative primary studies analyzing gender and socioeconomic inequalities in the participation in CRC screening programmes implemented by public and private health-care providers and addressing 45- to 75-year-old population.

RESULTS

A total of 96 studies, described in 102 articles, were included. Most were quantitative observational studies and analyzed population-based screening programmes. They were carried out mainly in the UK (n=29) and the USA (n=18). Participation in screening programmes varied from 1.1% to 82.8% using several methods. A total of 87 studies assessed participation by sex and one focussed on men, but only two provided an analysis from a gender perspective. Although men are at a higher risk of developing CRC, they generally were less likely to participate in screening programmes. Screening attendance was higher among the least deprived areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender and socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening participation should be addressed through the design of tailored interventions with a multidimensional focus.

摘要

背景

由于结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率和死亡率,它是一个主要的公共卫生问题。通过早期发现,筛查计划有助于降低其对人群的影响。然而,健康社会决定因素的分布不均会导致不平等。本研究旨在确定 CRC 筛查计划参与方面的社会不平等。

方法

对文献进行了系统的回顾,在健康和社会数据库中搜索了自 2000 年以来发表的英文、西班牙语、葡萄牙语和法语论文。搜索策略结合了筛查、CRC、参与和社会不平等方面的术语。纳入的论文是定量或定性的初级研究,分析了公共和私人医疗保健提供者实施的 CRC 筛查计划中性别和社会经济不平等参与情况,并针对 45 至 75 岁的人群。

结果

共纳入 96 项研究,共 102 篇文章。大多数是定量观察性研究,分析了基于人群的筛查计划。它们主要在英国(n=29)和美国(n=18)进行。使用多种方法,筛查计划的参与率从 1.1%到 82.8%不等。共有 87 项研究评估了性别参与情况,其中一项专门针对男性,但只有两项从性别角度进行了分析。尽管男性患 CRC 的风险更高,但他们参与筛查计划的可能性通常较低。筛查出勤率在最不富裕地区较高。

结论

应通过设计具有多维重点的定制干预措施来解决 CRC 筛查参与方面的性别和社会经济不平等问题。

相似文献

1
Inequalities in participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.参与结直肠癌筛查计划的不平等现象:系统评价。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;30(3):416-425. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz236.
2
Inequalities and risk factors related to non-participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.与未参与结直肠癌筛查计划相关的不平等现象和风险因素:一项系统综述
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;31(2):346-355. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa203.
3
Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide.全球范围内,结直肠癌筛查规划中存在社会经济和种族不平等现象。
Gut. 2018 Apr;67(4):679-687. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313311. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
4
To participate or not? Giving voice to gender and socio-economic differences in colorectal cancer screening programmes.是否参与?在结直肠癌筛查计划中表达性别和社会经济差异的声音。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Sep;20(5):669-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01263.x. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
5
Modelling cost-effective strategies for minimising socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening outcomes in England.建立经济有效的模型,以减少英格兰结直肠癌筛查结果中的社会经济不平等现象。
Prev Med. 2022 Sep;162:107131. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107131. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
6
Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.影响患者遵医嘱参与公共资金资助的结直肠癌筛查项目的因素:系统评价。
Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce Social Health Inequalities: A French Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于导航程序的结直肠癌筛查对减少社会健康不平等的成本效益分析:一项法国群组随机对照试验。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
8
Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review.结直肠癌筛查参与情况:一项系统综述
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):158-68. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv148. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Participation rates for organized colorectal cancer screening programmes: an international comparison.有组织的结直肠癌筛查项目的参与率:一项国际比较。
J Med Screen. 2015 Sep;22(3):119-26. doi: 10.1177/0969141315584694. Epub 2015 May 12.
10
Patient navigation to reduce social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.患者导航以减少结直肠癌筛查参与中的社会不平等:一项集群随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Widening socioeconomic inequalities in cancer incidence and related potential to reduce cancer between 2008 and 2019 in Germany.2008年至2019年期间,德国癌症发病率方面社会经济不平等加剧,以及降低癌症发病率的相关潜力。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17859-5.
2
Prevalence and social inequalities in the use of cancer screening tests in Campinas, Brazil (ISACamp 2014/15).巴西坎皮纳斯市癌症筛查检测使用情况的患病率及社会不平等现象(ISACamp 2014/15)
Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 4;28:e250043. doi: 10.1590/1980-549720250043. eCollection 2025.
3
Spatial insights into colorectal cancer risk factors and priority areas for screening in the United Kingdom based on data from the UK Biobank.
基于英国生物银行的数据,对英国结直肠癌风险因素及筛查优先区域的空间洞察。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328778. eCollection 2025.
4
eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients.慢性病患者的电子健康素养与癌症筛查态度
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03595-3.
5
Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review.旨在减少癌症连续过程中不平等现象的干预措施的特征:一项范围综述。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 15;157(6):1043-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35478. Epub 2025 May 26.
6
Developing and validating key performance indicators for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening programs: a literature review and Delphi survey.制定和验证乳腺癌、宫颈癌及结直肠癌筛查项目的关键绩效指标:一项文献综述与德尔菲调查
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 3;13:1491226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1491226. eCollection 2025.
7
The impact of individual and contextual socioeconomic factors on colorectal cancer screening adherence in Turin, Italy: a multilevel analysis.意大利都灵个体及背景社会经济因素对结直肠癌筛查依从性的影响:一项多层次分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):1235. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22396-x.
8
Interventions to increase uptake in a fecal-immunochemical test population-based colorectal cancer screening program: A quasi-experimental study of first-time invitees.在基于粪便免疫化学检测的人群结直肠癌筛查项目中提高参与率的干预措施:一项针对首次受邀者的准实验研究
Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;131(7):e35760. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35760.
9
Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.语言作为弗拉芒地区结直肠癌筛查的障碍:一项生态学研究。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Mar 25;83(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01541-3.
10
The Impact of Age on Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Strategies: Are Fecal Immunochemical Tests FIT for Surveillance?年龄对结直肠癌监测策略偏好的影响:粪便免疫化学检测是否适合用于监测?
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(5):e70723. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70723.