Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E University Blvd., Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona Cancer Center, 3838 N Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jan;29(1):349-358. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05468-z. Epub 2020 May 3.
Fighting cancer is a costly battle, and understanding the relationship between patient-reported financial toxicity (FT) and health outcomes can help inform interventions for post-treatment cancer survivors.
Stages I-III solid tumor, insured US cancer survivors (N = 103) completed a survey addressing FT (as measured by the standardized COST measure) and clinically relevant health outcomes (including health-related quality of life [HRQOL] and adherence to recommended survivorship health behaviors). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess demographic and disease-specific correlates of FT, and to assess the predictive value of FT on HRQOL and adherence to survivorship health behaviors.
Approximately 18% of respondents noted FT levels associated with significant financial burden. In univariate analyses, after correcting for multiple comparisons, greater FT was associated with unpartnered status, non-retirement, and lower level of educational attainment. Greater FT was also significantly associated with HRQOL components of anxiety, fatigue, pain, physical functioning, and social functioning. FT was not significantly associated with any measured survivorship health behaviors. In multivariate analyses, FT was found to be a meaningful predictor of patient-reported anxiety, fatigue, physical functioning, and social functioning above and beyond theoretically and statistically relevant demographic characteristics.
Although overall levels of FT were lower among cancer survivors in this sample, as compared with active treatment patients assessed in previous studies, financial burden continued to be a concern for a significant minority of cancer survivors and was associated with components of reduced HRQOL. Further research is needed to understand FT among underinsured survivors and those treated in community oncology settings.
Incorporation of FT assessment into survivorship care planning could enhance clinical assessment of survivors' FT vulnerability, help address the dynamic and persistent challenges of survivorship, and help identify those most in need of intervention across the cancer care continuum.
与癌症作斗争是一场代价高昂的战斗,了解患者报告的财务毒性(FT)与健康结果之间的关系,可以帮助为治疗后的癌症幸存者提供干预措施。
I-III 期实体瘤、有保险的美国癌症幸存者(N=103)完成了一项调查,内容涉及 FT(由标准化 COST 量表衡量)和临床相关健康结果(包括健康相关生活质量[HRQOL]和对推荐的生存健康行为的依从性)。采用单变量和多变量分析评估 FT 的人口统计学和疾病特异性相关性,并评估 FT 对 HRQOL 和对生存健康行为的依从性的预测价值。
约 18%的受访者表示存在与显著经济负担相关的 FT 水平。在单变量分析中,在进行多次比较校正后,FT 较高与未婚状态、非退休状态和较低教育程度有关。FT 较高还与焦虑、疲劳、疼痛、身体功能和社会功能等 HRQOL 组成部分显著相关。FT 与任何测量的生存健康行为均无显著相关性。在多变量分析中,FT 是患者报告的焦虑、疲劳、身体功能和社会功能的重要预测指标,超过了理论上和统计学上相关的人口统计学特征。
尽管与之前研究中评估的正在接受治疗的患者相比,该样本中的癌症幸存者的 FT 总体水平较低,但经济负担仍是相当一部分癌症幸存者关注的问题,并且与 HRQOL 降低的部分有关。需要进一步研究来了解保险不足的幸存者和在社区肿瘤学环境中接受治疗的幸存者的 FT。
将 FT 评估纳入生存护理计划中可以增强对幸存者 FT 脆弱性的临床评估,有助于解决生存的动态和持续挑战,并有助于确定癌症护理连续体中最需要干预的人群。