Post-graduate Program in Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil; Health-Related Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Post-graduate Program in Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil; Health-Related Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jul;158(1):153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.701. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
New strategies that allow timely referral to outpatient palliative care (PC) for cancer patients are sought. The authors developed a 16-item checklist tool with 3 categories of care priorities based on patients' physical functionality. To evaluate the potential clinical impact of the use of these criteria in patients with advanced breast and gynecological cancer (ABGC) seen at oncology clinics.
The study was divided into 2 phases. In Phase I, research nurse prospectively assessed the referral criteria among patients with ABGC who had not yet been referred to PC. The oncologists' (routine) referral rate was compared to the referral rate if the criteria were applied universally. In Phase II, we implemented routine screening with these referral criteria without automatic trigger. Patients not yet evaluated by PC were retrospectively evaluated regarding the rate of screening and how often they met criteria.
Among the 120 patients evaluated in Phase I, oncologists referred 23 (19%) and the screening criteria identified another 82 (68%) who may benefit from PC, potentially increasing the PC referral rate by 3.2-fold. Patients would have been referred earlier using the criteria than based on oncologists' judgement (median survival 451 days vs. 178, p < 0.001). In Phase II, among the patients who were not yet receiving PC, 38.6% (97 of 251) met at least one criterion.
The use of referral criteria has the potential to significantly increase the number of timely palliative care referral. Further research is needed to test the implementation of these criteria.
寻求能够及时将癌症患者转介至门诊姑息治疗(PC)的新策略。作者基于患者的身体功能制定了一个包含 3 个护理优先级类别的 16 项检查表工具。评估这些标准在肿瘤科就诊的晚期乳腺和妇科癌症(ABGC)患者中使用的潜在临床影响。
该研究分为 2 个阶段。在第 I 阶段,研究护士前瞻性评估了尚未转介至 PC 的 ABGC 患者的转诊标准。将肿瘤学家(常规)的转诊率与如果普遍应用这些标准的转诊率进行比较。在第 II 阶段,我们实施了常规筛查,并使用这些转诊标准,没有自动触发。对尚未接受 PC 评估的患者进行回顾性评估,以评估筛查率和符合标准的频率。
在第 I 阶段评估的 120 名患者中,肿瘤学家转诊了 23 名(19%),筛查标准确定了另外 82 名(68%)可能受益于 PC,潜在地将 PC 转诊率提高了 3.2 倍。使用标准比基于肿瘤学家判断更早地转介患者(中位生存时间 451 天与 178 天,p<0.001)。在第 II 阶段,在尚未接受 PC 的患者中,38.6%(251 名中的 97 名)符合至少一个标准。
使用转诊标准有可能显著增加及时姑息治疗转诊的数量。需要进一步研究来测试这些标准的实施。